Mobilizations around the law, iconoclasm, and the (a)moral
Mobilizations around the law, iconoclasm, and the (a)moral
复制标题
围绕法律、反传统和道德的动员
DOI：
10.1086/712184
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kipnis A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kipnis A
无论我们将其归因于操纵社交媒体的新技术、反全球化的反弹，还是特定精英演员之间对金钱和权力的竞争加剧，以“人民”名义的威权主义正在世界各地扩散。巴西、中国、美国、印度、英国、匈牙利、俄罗斯和澳大利亚只是不断扩大的名单中的几个例子。民粹主义巩固战略产生了一系列“无名小卒”（Rahman 2020），这些人可以与之对抗。事实上，如果不妖魔化其他种族化的少数民族、移民、难民和宗教团体，这些团体就无法取得多大进展。小人物和他们的支持者——包括被边缘化的社区、学生、艺术家和妇女——都在反抗。这些动态以及大流行妄想和紧急措施是许多研究人员在其实地工作地点面临的全球情景的一个可怕部分。像“我们生活在一个不确定的时代”这样的短语很快就变成了俗语，这是我们唯一可以依靠的确定性。2019年12月，右翼印度民族主义政党印度人民党（BJP）发起的反对印度宪法修正案的广泛抗议活动就是这样一种情况。《公民身份（修正）法案》（CAA）由执政的多数派印度人民党通过，并授予2015年之前抵达印度的受迫害的少数民族公民身份，这些少数民族来自巴基斯坦、孟加拉国和阿富汗，但不包括穆斯林。本期杂志以印度学者参与、观察和分析围绕这一事件的破裂（包括他们自己的机构）的“潮流”部分为开端。国家暴力反对亲
Whether we attribute it to new technologies for manipulating social media, an anti-globalization backlash, or heightened competition for money and power among particular elite actors, authoritarianism in the name of “the people” is proliferating across the world. Brazil, China, the United States, India, the United Kingdom, Hungary, Russia, and Australia are just a few examples from an ever-expanding list. Populist consolidation strategies generate a range of “nobodies”(Rahman 2020) against whom to pitch “somebodies.” Indeed, these groups cannot gather much mileage without demonizing an Other—racialized minorities, migrants, refugees, and religious groups who must be rejected. The nobodies and their supporters—including marginalized communities, students, artists, and women—resist. These dynamics along with pandemic paranoia and emergency measures are a formidable part of the global scenario that confronts many researchers in their fieldwork sites. Fast becoming a colloquialism, phrases such as “We live in uncertain times” are about the only certainty that we can count on.The widespread protests from December 2019 against amendments to the Constitution of India by the rightwing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are one such scenario. The Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) was passed by the ruling majority BJP, and granted citizenship to persecuted minorities from nearby countries, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, who arrived in India before 2015—but not to those who are Muslims. This journal issue leads with a Currents section by Indian scholars participating, observing, and analyzing the ruptures around them surrounding this event including within their own institutions. State violence against pro-
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
--
作者：
Graeber, David
通讯作者：
Graeber, David
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Odile Ferly
通讯作者：
Odile Ferly
金钱很重要：西非社区现代史上的不稳定、价值观和社会支付
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
M. Moran
通讯作者：
M. Moran
Do Kamo：美拉尼西亚世界的人和神话
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Peter B. Huber;Maurice Leenhardt;B. Gulati;V. Crapanzano
通讯作者：
V. Crapanzano