Augmentative and alternative communication: the future of text on the move
Augmentative and alternative communication: the future of text on the move
复制标题
增强性和替代性沟通：移动文本的未来
DOI：
10.1007/s10209-006-0033-0
复制
发表时间：
2002
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
J. P. Hansen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Johansen;J. P. Hansen
目前可用于小型移动的设备上的文本输入的方法在输入速度方面表现出较差的性能，这对接受和增长提出了潜在的障碍。本文提出了一个分析移动的文本输入表明，可能的解决方案是使用语言建模和仔细的交互设计和验证相结合。本文认为，在增强和替代通信（AAC）的研究是高度相关的移动的文本输入问题，反之亦然，并提供了机会，研究解决方案，将是可行的，实现未来几代的移动的设备。在本文提出的系统的设计中，较少的输入按钮，自然语言处理（NLP）和多模态输入的技术，已被评估和应用。与最初的预期相反，分析和评估表明，可用性和人为因素往往比输入法的效率更重要。在进行的研究中，简化的文本通话系统提高了15%的生产力。这有力地表明，在现实场景中提高文本生成速率的最佳方法是在交互和用户界面中力求简单和清晰，而不是选择在系统中包括每一个可能的节省时间的功能。因此，潜在的简化的经验验证提倡作为一种通用的设计方法。
The methods currently available for text entry on small mobile devices exhibit poor performance in terms of input speed, which presents a potential barrier to acceptance and growth. This paper presents an analysis of mobile text entry indicating that the likely solution is a combination of the use of language modelling and careful interaction design and verification. The paper argues that research in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is highly relevant to the mobile text entry problem and vice versa, and offers the opportunity to research solutions that will be feasible to implement on future generations of mobile devices. In the design of the system presented in this paper, fewer input buttons, natural language processing (NLP) and multimodal inputs are techniques that have been evaluated and applied. Contrary to initial expectations, analysis and evaluation showed that usability and human factors often are more significant factors in performance than the efficiency of the input method. In the conducted study, simplifications of a text-to-talk system increased productivity by 15%. This provides a strong indication that the best way to increase text production rates in realistic scenarios is to strive for simplicity and clarity in the interaction and user interface, rather than opting for including every possible time-saving feature in the system. Empirical validations of potential simplifications are therefore advocated as a general design methodology.
DOI：
10.1109/86.736156
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lesher,GW;Moulton,BJ;Higginbotham,DJ
通讯作者：
Higginbotham,DJ