The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire
The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/19012276.2018.1443280
复制
发表时间：
2018-01-01
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Jansson, Billy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Almen, Niclas;Lundberg, Hanna;Jansson, Billy
最近的研究表明，从工作压力和努力中恢复可能对健康和福祉至关重要。因此，有效的恢复测量变得重要。本研究的主要目的是实证评估和寻求支持的假设四因素模型的瑞典版的恢复经验问卷（REACH）。将总样本（N = 680）随机分为两个子样本。第一个子样本用于使用探索性因子分析寻找最佳拟合模型，第二子样本用于使用验证性因子分析测试先验模型。结果支持建议的四因素结构的规模为男性和女性。此外，除了高可靠性估计，该工具被证明有很好的收敛性和判别效度的所有四个因素。讨论了与以恢复为重点的干预措施结合使用的影响，如低响应率的局限性。
Recent research has indicated that recovery from work stress and effort might be crucial for health and well-being. Thus, a valid measurement of recovery becomes important. The main purpose of the present study was to empirically evaluate and seeking support for the hypothesized four-factor model of the Swedish version of Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ). The total sample (N = 680) was randomly split into two subsamples. The first subsample was used for finding the best-fitting model using an exploratory factor analysis and the second subsample was used to test the a priori model using confirmatory factor analysis. The results support the proposed four-factor structure of the scale for both males and females. Additionally, apart from high reliability estimates, this instrument proved to have good convergent and discriminant validity for all four factors. Implications for the use of the REQ in conjunction with recovery-focused interventions were discussed, as were limitations such as low response rate.