A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions
A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1057/jors.1987.44
复制
发表时间：
1987-03
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
K. Yoon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Yoon
离散多目标问题的折衷解决方案的应用带来了一些技术上的灵活性，如距离函数的选择计算规范化的属性评级和两个选项之间的距离，以及理想和负理想的选择之间的选择，实现公理的选择。这些灵活性是不可取的，因为该方法可能会产生冲突的偏好替代排名，这取决于参数的选择。本文引入了距离函数的可信性度量，并采用了更广泛的选择公理概念，以调和折衷解之间的分歧。
The application of compromise solutions to discrete multi-objective problems brings about some technical flexibilities, such as the selection of distance function for computing both normalized attribute ratings and distances between two alternatives, and the choice between the ideal and negative-ideal alternatives for implementing the axiom of choice. These flexibilities are undesirable, since the method may yield conflicting preference-alternative rankings, depending on parameter choice. This paper introduces a credibility measurement of distance function and takes a broader concept of the axiom of choice in order to reconcile disagreement among compromise solutions.