Global Monetary Order and the Liberal Order Debate
Global Monetary Order and the Liberal Order Debate
复制标题
全球货币秩序与自由秩序之争
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
W. Winecoff
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carla Norrlof;Paul Poast;B. Cohen;Sabreena Croteau;Aashna Khanna;D. McDowell;Hongying Wang;W. Winecoff
最近关于“自由国际秩序”（LIO）的辩论在构成该秩序的制度和问题领域上一直含糊不清。这可能是由“自由主义”的不同观点驱动的，或许更重要的是，由主导辩论的安全学者驱动的。从探索全球货币秩序要素（储备货币、国际金融机构和中央银行）的学者的角度来看，情况有所不同。在安全学者指出美国影响力下降的地方，全球货币政治学者认为美国将继续占据主导地位。此外，货币地位的突出一直是大国在更广泛范围内建立秩序的项目可行性的先决条件。这次研讨会提供了这样一个相反的叙述。虽然安全挑战是真实存在的，但过去十年的危机实际上加强了美元和美国金融力量在国际体系中的中心地位。
The recent “liberal international order” (LIO) debate has been vague about the institutions and issue areas that constitute the order. This is likely driven by competing views of “liberal” and, perhaps more importantly, by security scholars dominating the debate. From the perspective of scholars who explore the elements of the global monetary order (reserve currencies, international financial institutions, and central banks), the picture is different. Where security scholars point to a decline in US influence, scholars of global monetary politics see continued US dominance. Moreover, monetary prominence has been a precondition for the viability of great power projects of order building more generally. This symposium offers such a counter narrative. While the security challenges are real, the crises of the last decade have actually reinforced the centrality of the US dollar and American financial power in the international system.