The case for remote sensing of individual plants.
The case for remote sensing of individual plants.
复制标题
单个植物遥感的案例。
DOI:
10.1002/ajb2.1347
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
K. Cushman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Kellner;L. Albert;John T Burley;K. Cushman
Remote sensing has greatly advanced our understanding of the land surface and the role of biology within it (Tucker and Sellers, 1986). But our ability to generate observations from remote sensing data at scales clearly aligned with biological processes has been limited. The problem is that biological processes like natural selection, metabolism, and resource allocation vary within and among individuals and change on scales of space and time that are finer than the granularity of traditional remote sensing measurements. Advances in technology are poised to overcome this problem by generating data from tower mounted, airborne and satellite sensors at scales of space and time aligned with biological understanding. Miniaturized sensor designs focus on lightweight instruments that can be carried by drones or operated on field platforms. And constellations of small sensors called cube‐sats are now working together in space to image the entire land surface of our planet every day at resolutions fine enough to resolve individual plants. The quantitative step forward represented by these new technologies is significant, but the most important advance is conceptual. Measurements from remote sensing at ultra‐high spatial and temporal resolution open the door to characterizing phenomena that have been beyond our grasp, including population dynamics (Kellner and Hubbell, 2017, 2018), high‐spatial‐resolution phenology (Wu et al., 2016), and physical quantities that can be related to organismal condition, like foliar chemistry, canopy temperature and solar‐induced fluorescence (Daumard et al., 2010; Porcar‐Castell et al., 2014). These new measurements cross thresholds of scale in space, time, and biological organization that are clearly aligned with decades of understanding in plant biology (Gamon et al., 1992; Demmig‐Adams and Adams, 2006).
影响因子:
11.6
作者:
Li, Xing;Xiao, Jingfeng;Varlagin, Andrej
通讯作者:
Varlagin, Andrej
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Sun, Y.;Frankenberg, C.;Yuen, K.
通讯作者:
Yuen, K.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1320008111
发表时间:
2014-04-08
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Guanter, Luis;Zhang, Yongguang;Griffis, Timothy J.
通讯作者:
Griffis, Timothy J.