DEFINITION AND ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY IN SOCIAL STEREOTYPES
DEFINITION AND ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY IN SOCIAL STEREOTYPES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0033-295x.100.1.109
复制
发表时间：
1993-01-01
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
PARK, B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
JUDD, CM;PARK, B
在社会刻板印象研究中，一个长期存在的问题是它们的准确性。然而，对于陈规定型观念可能准确或不准确的各种方式以及如何评估其准确性，没有明确的概念。本文旨在纠正这种情况。三种形式的刻板印象的不准确性被确定为：刻板印象的不准确性，效价不准确性，和分散不准确性。每一种形式的影响进行了讨论，沿着如何使用全精度设计进行评估。过去的研究，试图检查刻板印象的准确性进行审查，并在这个问题上提出了新的数据。尽管人们一直感兴趣，但评估刻板印象准确性的理论和方法上的困难仍然很大。本文的目的是提醒研究人员注意这些困难，并指出他们的解决方案。
A perennial issue in the study of social stereotypes concerns their accuracy. Yet, there is no clear concept of the various ways in which stereotypes may be accurate or inaccurate and how one would assess their accuracy. This article is designed to rectify this situation. Three forms of stereotype inaccuracy are identified: stereotypic inaccuracy, valence inaccuracy, and dispersion inaccuracy. The implications of each form are discussed, along with how each can be assessed using a full-accuracy design. Past research that has attempted to examine stereotype accuracy is reviewed, and new data on the issue are presented. Although of perennial interest, the theoretical and methodological difficulties of assessing stereotype accuracy are substantial. The goal in this article is to alert the researcher to these difficulties and point toward their solution.