GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmj.j3453
复制
发表时间：
2017-08-02
影响因子：
105.7
通讯作者：
Tysall, C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Staniszewska, S.;Brett, J.;Tysall, C.
尽管在过去的十年中，患者和公众参与（PPI）的证据基础已经扩大，但论文中报告的质量往往不一致，限制了我们对它如何工作，在什么情况下，为谁工作以及为什么工作的理解。在GRIPP 2的发展过程中，患者作为研究伙伴参与各个阶段的合作。方法采用EQUATOR方法制定报告指南。根据更新的系统综述证据，对原始GRIPP（患者和公众参与报告指南）检查表进行了修订。采用三轮德尔菲调查，就指南中包含的项目达成共识。随后的一次面对面会议就德尔菲过程中未达成共识的项目达成了一致意见。TS 143参与者同意参加第一轮，第二轮有86%（123/143）的回应，第三轮有78%（112/143）的回应。德尔菲调查确定了对长格式（LF）和短格式（SF）版本的需求。GRIPP 2-LF包括34个项目，涉及目标，定义，概念和理论，方法，参与的阶段和性质，背景，捕获或测量影响，结果，经济评估和反思，适用于主要关注PPI的研究。GRIPP 2-SF包括目的、方法、结果、结局和批判性观点5个条目，适用于PPI是次要关注点的研究。结论GRIPP 2-LF和GRIPP 2-SF是国际上首个基于证据的、共识的、知情的、报告患者和公众参与研究的指南。GRIPP 2的两个版本都旨在提高国际PPI证据库的质量、透明度和一致性，以确保PPI实践基于最佳证据。为了鼓励其广泛传播，这篇文章可以在BMJ和Research Involvement and Engagement期刊网站上免费访问。
BACKGROUNDWhile the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why.OBJECTIVETo develop international consensus on the key items to report to enhance the quality, transparency, and consistency of the PPI evidence base. To collaboratively involve patients as research partners at all stages in the development of GRIPP2.METHODSThe EQUATOR method for developing reporting guidelines was used. The original GRIPP (Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public) checklist was revised, based on updated systematic review evidence. A three round Delphi survey was used to develop consensus on items to be included in the guideline. A subsequent face-to-face meeting produced agreement on items not reaching consensus during the Delphi process.RESULTS143 participants agreed to participate in round one, with an 86% (123/143) response for round two and a 78% (112/143) response for round three. The Delphi survey identified the need for long form (LF) and short form (SF) versions. GRIPP2-LF includes 34 items on aims, definitions, concepts and theory, methods, stages and nature of involvement, context, capture or measurement of impact, outcomes, economic assessment, and reflections and is suitable for studies where the main focus is PPI. GRIPP2SF includes five items on aims, methods, results, outcomes, and critical perspective and is suitable for studies where PPI is a secondary focus.CONCLUSIONSGRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF represent the first international evidence based, consensus informed guidance for reporting patient and public involvement in research. Both versions of GRIPP2 aim to improve the quality, transparency, and consistency of the international PPI evidence base, to ensure PPI practice is based on the best evidence. In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on The BMJ and Research Involvement and Engagement journal websites.