A comparison between audio computer-assisted self-interviews and clinician interviews for obtaining the sexual history
A comparison between audio computer-assisted self-interviews and clinician interviews for obtaining the sexual history
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/01.olq.0000145855.36181.13
复制
发表时间：
2004-12-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Holmes, KK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kurth, AE;Martin, DP;Holmes, KK
目的：本研究的目的是比较音频计算机辅助自我访谈（ACASI）和临床管理的性史之间的报告。目的：本研究的目的是探讨ACASI在性传播疾病（STD）诊所的有用性。研究：作者在一家城市公共性病诊所对609名患者（52%为男性，59%为白人）进行了ACASI和临床病史（CH）的横断面研究。我们评估了数据的完整性、项目流行率和性史报告的一致性，并将患者特征变量分类为社会中立（n = 5）、敏感（n = 11）或奖励（n = 4）。结果：与同性性行为（19.6%比11.5%）、口交（67.3%比50.0%）、交易性行为（20.7%比9.8%）和使用安非他明（4.9%比0.7%）相比，女性更常报告ACASI，但报告性病症状的可能性更小(55.4%比63.7%；所有McNemar卡方P值均为P值
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare reporting between audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) and clinician-administered sexual histories.Goal: The goal of this study was to explore the usefulness of ACASI in sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. Study: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of ACASI followed by a clinician history (CH) among 609 patients (52% male, 59% white) in an urban, public STD clinic. We assessed completeness of data, item prevalence, and report concordance for sexual history and patient characteristic variables classified as socially neutral (n = 5), sensitive (n = 11), or rewarded (n = 4).Results: Women more often reported by ACASI than during CH same-sex behavior (19.6% vs. 11.5%), oral sex (67.3% vs. 50.0%), transactional sex (20.7% vs. 9.8%), and amphetamine use (4.9% vs. 0.7%) but were less likely to report STD symptoms (55.4% vs. 63.7%; all McNemar chi-squared P values