Eye Tracking in the Wild: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Eye Tracking in the Wild: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
复制标题
野外眼动追踪：好的、坏的和丑陋的
DOI：
10.16910/jemr.8.5.1
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
O. Lappi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O. Lappi
在丰富的自然环境中以及在头部和身体自由运动的条件下模拟人类认知和行为是视觉科学的主要目标。眼动追踪已被证明是一种很好的生理手段，可以用来研究我们如何与复杂的3D环境（真实的和虚拟的）进行视觉交互。本文首先从哲学的角度审视了不同生态自然水平的方法（传统的严格控制的实验室任务，低和高保真模拟器，完全自然主义的现实世界研究）的优点（好）和缺点（坏）。然后，我们讨论了更多的技术术语的差异，所需的方法“在野外”，相比“收到”实验室为基础的方法。我们强调了基于实验室的分析方法，术语和默认假设的不加反思的应用如何导致糟糕的实验设计甚至虚假的结果（丑陋）。其目的不是提供一本最佳实践的“食谱”，而是提高人们对自然主义研究带来的一些特殊问题的认识。沿着提供了有用的文献参考。其目的是提供一个景观的观点，研究人员规划严重的基础研究人类的思想和行为
Modelling human cognition and behaviour in rich naturalistic settings and under conditions of free movement of the head and body is a major goal of visual science. Eye tracking has turned out to be an excellent physiological means to investigate how we visually interact with complex 3D environments, real and virtual. This review begins with a philosophical look at the advantages (the Good) and the disadvantages (the Bad) in approaches with different levels of ecological naturalness (traditional tightly controlled laboratory tasks, low- and high-fidelity simulators, fully naturalistic real-world studies). We then discuss in more technical terms the differences in approach required “in the wild”, compared to “received” lab-based methods. We highlight how the unreflecting application of lab-based analysis methods, terminology, and tacit assumptions can lead to poor experimental design or even spurious results (the Ugly). The aim is not to present a “cookbook” of best practices, but to raise awareness of some of the special concerns that naturalistic research brings about. References to helpful literature are provided along the way. The aim is to provide an overview of the landscape from the point of view of a researcher planning serious basic research on the human mind and behaviour
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Diaz, Gabriel;Cooper, Joseph;Hayhoe, Mary
通讯作者：
Hayhoe, Mary
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Tatler BW;Hayhoe MM;Land MF;Ballard DH
通讯作者：
Ballard DH