日本語版Ten Item Personality Inventory(TIPI-J)の構成(1):―項目の構成と信頼性の検討―
日本語版Ten Item Personality Inventory(TIPI-J)の構成(1):―項目の構成と信頼性の検討―
复制标题
日本版十项人格量表（TIPI-J）的结构（1）： - 项目结构和可靠性检查 -
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.827
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
ピノ カトローニ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
小塩 真司;阿部 晋吾;ピノ カトローニ
自D. Bakan（1966）以来，理论家们一直主张缓解对于人际领域内成功适应的重要性。虽然缓解以前被定义为机构与共融之间的平衡（维度间缓解），但环形框架表明，缓解也可以定义为机构内部的平衡和共融内部的平衡（维度内缓解）。在目前的两项研究中，参与者在20天的时间里收集了他们的人际行为和社交互动后的影响记录。然后使用随机系数程序来检查这两种对比模型的缓解预测的影响。没有发现维度间缓解的经验证据。研究结果表明，通过适度的行为表达，代理和交流在维度内都得到了缓解。（PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2016 APA，版权所有）
Theorists since D. Bakan (1966) have advocated the importance of mitigation for successful adaptation within the interpersonal domain. Although mitigation has previously been conceptualized as a balance between agency and communion (interdimensional mitigation), the circumplex framework suggests that mitigation may also be conceptualized as a balance within agency and a balance within communion (intradimensional mitigation). In the two present studies, participants collected records of their interpersonal behavior and affect subsequent to their social interactions for a period of 20 days. Random coefficient procedures were then used to examine these two contrasting models of mitigation in the prediction of affect. No empirical evidence of interdimensional mitigation was found. The findings suggest that agency and communion were each mitigated intradimensionally through moderate levels of behavioral expression.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)