Erratum to: A Latent Class Analysis of Heterosexual Young Men's Masculinities.
Erratum to: A Latent Class Analysis of Heterosexual Young Men's Masculinities.
复制标题
勘误表：异性恋年轻男性男性气质的潜在阶级分析。
DOI：
10.1007/s10508-015-0673-3
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Hoppe,MarilynJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Casey,ErinA;Masters,NTatiana;Beadnell,Blair;Wells,ElizabethA;Morrison,DianeM;Hoppe,MarilynJ
报告了艾琳·A·凯西、N·塔蒂亚娜·马斯特斯、布莱尔·比德内尔、伊丽莎白·A·威尔斯、黛安·M·莫里森和玛丽莲·J·霍普(性行为档案，高级在线出版物，2015年10月23日，NP)的《异性恋青年男子气概的潜在类别分析》中的一个错误。读者应该注意到，勘误表中的承认本应包括在原文中。(原文的以下摘要出现在Record 2015-48929-001中)。平行的研究机构描述了男性理解和构建其男性身份(通常被称为“男性特征”)的多样和复杂的方式，以及坚持传统的男性特征概念如何使男性面临消极的性和健康后果的风险。这项分析的目标是将这两种调查流结合在一起。我们使用了555名异性恋活跃的年轻男性的全国性在线样本的数据，使用潜在类别分析(LCA)来检测男性身份的模式，这是基于男性对“主导”男性的行为和态度指标的认可，包括性态度和行为。LCA确定了四种概念上截然不同的男性身份特征。两组，分别称为规范和规范/男性活动组，占样本的88%，其特点是对态度、性脚本和行为的坚持程度较低，与“主导”男性气概一致，但他们参与以男性为导向的活动(如运动队)的程度不同。只有8%的样本包含了与关于男子气概的“传统”观念相一致的男子气概；这一群体被贴上了厌女症的标签，因为对女性伴侣的性侵和暴力行为很高。其余4%的人构成了以性为重点的群体，他们的特征是有大量的性伴侣，但对传统男性气概的其他指标的认可程度相对较低。后续分析显示，不同群体在性健康指标和物质使用健康指标上存在少量差异。研究结果对性健康和行为健康干预措施有影响，并表明很少有年轻男性体现或支持僵化的传统形式的男子气概。
Reports an error in" A latent class analysis of heterosexual young men’s masculinities" by Erin A. Casey, N. Tatiana Masters, Blair Beadnell, Elizabeth A. Wells, Diane M. Morrison and Marilyn J. Hoppe (Archives of Sexual Behavior, Advanced Online Publication, Oct 23, 2015, np). Readers should note that the Acknowledgments present in the erratum should have been included in the original article.(The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2015-48929-001). Parallel bodies of research have described the diverse and complex ways that men understand and construct their masculine identities (often termed “masculinities”) and, separately, how adherence to traditional notions of masculinity places men at risk for negative sexual and health outcomes. The goal of this analysis was to bring together these two streams of inquiry. Using data from a national, online sample of 555 heterosexually active young men, we employed latent class analysis (LCA) to detect patterns of masculine identities based on men’s endorsement of behavioral and attitudinal indicators of “dominant” masculinity, including sexual attitudes and behaviors. LCA identified four conceptually distinct masculine identity profiles. Two groups, termed the Normative and Normative/Male Activities groups, respectively, constituted 88% of the sample and were characterized by low levels of adherence to attitudes, sexual scripts, and behaviors consistent with “dominant” masculinity, but differed in their levels of engagement in male-oriented activities (eg, sports teams). Only eight percent of the sample comprised a masculinity profile consistent with “traditional” ideas about masculinity; this group was labeled Misogynistic because of high levels of sexual assault and violence toward female partners. The remaining four percent constituted a Sex-Focused group, characterized by high numbers of sexual partners, but relatively low endorsement of other indicators of traditional masculinity. Follow-up analyses showed a small number of differences across groups on sexual and substance use health indicators. Findings have implications for sexual and behavioral health interventions and suggest that very few young men embody or endorse rigidly traditional forms of masculinity.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)