Internal Dynamics of the Tryptophan Repressor (TrpR) and Two Functionally Distinct TrpR Variants, L75F-TrpR and A77V-TrpR, in Their L-Trp-Bound Forms
Internal Dynamics of the Tryptophan Repressor (TrpR) and Two Functionally Distinct TrpR Variants, L75F-TrpR and A77V-TrpR, in Their L-Trp-Bound Forms
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/bi200389k
复制
发表时间:
2011-06-14
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Copie, Valerie
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tripet, Brian P.;Goel, Anupam;Copie, Valerie
Backbone amide dynamics of the Escherichia colt tryptophan repressor protein (WT-TrpR) and two functionally distinct variants, L75F-TrpR and A77V-TrpR, in their holo (L-trytophan corepressor-bound) form have been characterized using N-15 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation. The three proteins possess very similar structures, ruling out major conformational differences as the source of their functional differences, and suggest that changes in protein flexibility are at the origin of their distinct functional properties. Comparison of site specific N-15-T-1, N-15-T-2, N-15-{H-1} nuclear Overhauser effect, reduced spectral density, and generalized order (S-2) parameters indicates that backbone dynamics in the three holo-repressors are overall very similar with a few notable and significant exceptions for backbone atoms residing within the proteins' DNA-binding domain. We find that flexibility is highly restricted for amides in core alpha-helices (i.e., helices A-C and F), and a comparable "stiffening" is observed for residues in the DNA recognition helix (helix E) of the helix D-turn-helix E (HTH) DNA-binding domain of the three holo-repressors. Unexpectedly, amides located in helix D and in adjacent turn regions remain flexible. These data support the concept that residual flexibility in TrpR is essential for repressor function, DNA binding, and molecular recognition of target operators. Comparison of the N-15 NMR relaxation parameters of the holo-TrpRs with those of the apo-TrpRs indicates that the single-point amino acid substitutions, L75F and A77V, perturb the flexibility of backbone amides of TrpR in very different ways and are most pronounced in the apo forms of the three repressors. Finally, we present these findings in the context of other DNA-binding proteins and the role of protein flexibility in molecular recognition.