On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
复制标题
论语音相似性与不相关言语效应的不相关性。
DOI：
10.1080/713755679
复制
发表时间：
1997
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Shaibe,DM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
LeCompte,DC;Shaibe,DM
无关紧要的背景演讲干扰了对视觉呈现的物品的即时回忆。Salame和Baddeley(1982)发现，增加无关语音和视觉项目之间的语音相似性大大增加了这种干扰。相比之下，Jones和Macken(1995)几乎没有发现这种增长的证据。本实验直接操纵了不相关的语音背景和要记住的视觉项目的语音相似性。实验1-4比较了与视觉刺激几乎没有音素共享的背景语音和共享所有视觉刺激音素的背景语音。没有发现语音相似性的影响。实验5复制了Salame和Baddeley的批判性实验的方法，但没有他们的结果。对于不相关言语效应的两种主要解释，这些数据对语音储存假说提出了强烈的挑战，同时也为状态变化假说提供了一些支持。
Irrelevant background speech disrupts immediate recall of visually presented items. Salame and Baddeley (1982) found that increasing the phonological similarity between the irrelevant speech and the visual items greatly increased this disruption. In contrast, Jones and Macken (1995) found little evidence for such an increase. The present experiments directly manipulated the phonological similarity of the irrelevant speech background and the to-be-remembered visual items. Experiments 1–4 compared background speech that shared virtually no phonemes with the visual stimuli with background speech that shared all of the phonemes of the visual stimuli. No effect of phonological similarity was found. Experiment 5 replicatedthe method of Salame and Baddeley's critical experiment but not their results. With regard to the two primary explanations of the irrelevant speech effect, these data present a strong challenge to the phonological store hypothesis while offering some support to the changing state hypothesis.