People in Irregular Modes of Employment: Are They Really Not Subject to Discrimination?
People in Irregular Modes of Employment: Are They Really Not Subject to Discrimination?
复制标题
非正规就业人员：真的不受歧视吗？
DOI：
10.1093/ssjj/4.2.183
复制
发表时间：
2001
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Mari Osawa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mari Osawa
在日本，非正式员工与正式员工的待遇不同被认为是理所当然的，但在能力、对公司的贡献或责任等方面的待遇差异是否被承认，则是一个非常有争议的问题。同样，如果这些待遇上的差别没有合理的理由，并被认定构成歧视，如何消除这种歧视？这些问题长期以来在企业和学术界引起了激烈的争论。本文试图对非正式劳动者的现状进行较为准确的描述，其中包括所谓的“全职兼职”或“帕拉兼职”（giji-pāto），他们的工作时间与全职正式员工相同，但被视为兼职。它着眼于最近的政府政策和学术理论有关的兼职，并提出了一些基本的挑战，那些学校的思想，坚持认为，在对待正式和非正式工人的差异不构成歧视。
In Japan, while it is considered a matter of course that irregular employees are treated differently from regulars, the question of whether differences in treatment are justified—in terms of ability, contribution to the company or responsibility—is a highly debatable issue. Again, if those differences in treatment are not justifiable in reasonable terms, and are found to constitute discrimination, how is that discrimination to be eradicated? All these matters have long generated intense controversy, both on the shop floor and in academia.This paper attempts to present a fairly accurate picture of the present situation of irregular workers, including the so‐called ‘full‐time part‐timers’ or ‘para‐part‐timers’ (giji‐pāto), who have the same scheduled working hours as full‐time regular employees but are treated as part‐timers. It looks at recent government policies and academic theories relating to part‐timers, and presents some fundamental challenges to those schools of thought that insist that differences in the treatment of regular and irregular workers do not constitute discrimination.