Re-examination of Team’s Play in a Mixed-strategy Game Experiment
Re-examination of Team’s Play in a Mixed-strategy Game Experiment
复制标题
混合策略博弈实验中团队表现的重新审视
DOI：
10.1080/13504851.2015.1090545
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Yoshitaka Okano
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tabuchi T.;J.-F. Thisse and X. Zhu;Picard P. M. and T. Tabuchi;Takatoshi Tabuchi;田渕隆俊;Takatoshi Tabuchi;Takatoshi Tabuchi;田渕隆俊;Takatoshi Tabuchi;Takatoshi Tabuchi;Takatoshi Tabuchi;Takatoshi Tabuchi;Tabuchi T.;Tabuchi T.;Yoshitaka Okano
Palacios-Huerta和Volij（2008）发现职业足球运动员在两人零和博弈中的行为与极大极小博弈一致，而Wooders（2010）重新检查了他们的数据，发现在几个方面不一致。这项研究将Wooders（2010）的类似分析应用于Okano（2013）的实验数据，该研究发现两名学生受试者的团队行为与极大极小博弈密切相关，并解决了团队是否表现出与专业人员相同的不一致性。团队被发现与极大极小化游戏有一致性，没有类似于专业人士的倾向。
Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2008) found that the behaviour of professional soccer players in two-person zero-sum games is consistent with minimax play, while Wooders (2010) re-examined their data and found inconsistencies in several respects. This study applies a similar analysis of Wooders (2010) to the experimental data in Okano (2013), which found that the behaviour of teams of two-student subjects conforms closely to minimax play, and addresses whether teams exhibit the same inconsistencies as professionals. Teams were found to have consistency with minimax play, with no tendencies similar to those of professionals.