Facility Location Problem in Differential Privacy Model Revisited

Facility Location Problem in Differential Privacy Model Revisited
复制标题

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019-10
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Yunus Esencayi;Marco Gaboardi;Shi Li;Di Wang
Yunus Esencayi;Marco Gaboardi;Shi Li;Di Wang
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yunus Esencayi;Marco Gaboardi;Shi Li;Di Wang

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在本文中,我们研究了设施的设施位置问题(DP),设施成本均匀。具体而言,我们首先表明,在层次上分离的树(HST)指标和Gupta ET中引入的超级设定输出设置下。 al。,有一个$ \ epsilon $ -DP算法可以实现$ o(\ frac {1} {\ epsilon})$(预期乘法)近似值;这意味着$ o(\ frac {\ log n} {\ epsilon})$近似值的一般度量案例,其中$ n $是输入度量的大小。这些界限改善了Gupta ET给出的最著名的结果。 al。特别是,我们的HST-Metrics的近似值与$ N $无关,并且通用指标的比率与输入度量的纵横比无关。负面的一面,我们表明,即使在HST Metrics on Metrics on Metrics on Metrics on Metrics on Betrics y,我们也表明,任何$ \ epsilon $ -dp算法的近似值均由$ \ omega(\ frac {1} {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ sqrt {\ frac {1} {在超级设定的输出设置下,设施成本均匀。下边界表明,HST指标对$ \ epsilon $的近似值的依赖性无法删除或大大改善。我们针对上和下边界的新型方法和技术可能会找到其他应用。
In this paper we study the facility location problem in the model of differential privacy (DP) with uniform facility cost. Specifically, we first show that under the hierarchically well-separated tree (HST) metrics and the super-set output setting that was introduced in Gupta et. al., there is an $\epsilon$-DP algorithm that achieves an $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon})$(expected multiplicative) approximation ratio; this implies an $O(\frac{\log n}{\epsilon})$ approximation ratio for the general metric case, where $n$ is the size of the input metric. These bounds improve the best-known results given by Gupta et. al. In particular, our approximation ratio for HST-metrics is independent of $n$, and the ratio for general metrics is independent of the aspect ratio of the input metric. On the negative side, we show that the approximation ratio of any $\epsilon$-DP algorithm is lower bounded by $\Omega(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}})$, even for instances on HST metrics with uniform facility cost, under the super-set output setting. The lower bound shows that the dependence of the approximation ratio for HST metrics on $\epsilon$ can not be removed or greatly improved. Our novel methods and techniques for both the upper and lower bound may find additional applications.