Being in Community: Re-Visioning Sociology
Being in Community: Re-Visioning Sociology
复制标题
融入社区：重新审视社会学
DOI：
10.1111/1467-954x.12429
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Valerie Walkerdine
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Studdert;Valerie Walkerdine
这期特刊最初是在《社会学评论》的主持下举办的一次研讨会。2014年4月在卡迪夫举行了题为“走向紧缩的微观社会性：社区和地方主义的可能性”的会议。其目的是重新思考社会科学的方法来社区。通过使社会性和存在性成为社区方法的中心，这期特刊试图问，重新思考我们对社区的方法意味着什么，并在此过程中想象一种社会科学，其中社区既是关键术语又是起点。这种反思在很大程度上要归功于大卫·Studdert的工作，他一直试图挑战现有的社区概念和方法（Studdert，2006; Studdert和Walkerdine，2016）。在批评他所谓的“国家/个人轴心”时，Studdert提出了通过重新强调共同体，即共同体的行动，并通过这一点，将关系性和社会性作为社会分析的主要内容，来重新思考共同体。起初，他将其描述为微观社会性（Studdert，2006），但人们一致认为，这回避了宏观问题，因此这被放弃，转而支持将社会性理解为主要的。鉴于这是研讨会期间使用的术语，许多对这一问题作出贡献的人都提到了这一术语。还必须提到近年来英国对社区研究重新产生兴趣和资助的背景。艺术和人文研究理事会的“连接社区方案”倡导并资助了以社区为重点的艺术、人文和社会科学研究。在该计划中，他们还支持与社区共同制作的研究，他们称之为“共同设计和共同创造”，这对于一个以学术为导向的研究理事会来说是非常大胆的一步。这份特刊的几位作者的研究都是以这种方式或与之相关的方式获得资助的，澳大利亚人权委员会在制定这一方案时，使与社区有关的新型研究创新成为可能。
This special issue started life as a seminar organized under the auspices of the Sociological Review. Entitled ‘Towards a Micro-sociality of Austerity: Community and Possibilities for Localism’, it was held in Cardiff in April 2014. Its aim was to rethink social scientific approaches to community. By making sociality and being-ness the centre of an approach to community, this special issue seeks to ask what it would mean to rethink our approach to community and in the process imagine a social sciences where community was both the key term and starting point. This rethinking owes a great deal to the work of David Studdert, who has consistently sought to challenge existing conceptualizations of, and approaches to, community (Studdert, 2006; Studdert and Walkerdine, 2016). In critiquing what he calls ‘the state/individual axis’, Studdert has proposed a rethinking of community through a re-emphasis on the communal, that is the action of communing, and through this, upon relationality and sociality as primary for social analysis. At first, he described this as micro-sociality (Studdert, 2006), but it was agreed that this begged the question of the macro and thus this was dropped in favour of an understanding of sociality as primary. Given that this was the term in use during the seminar, this term is referred to by many of the contributors to this issue. It is important also to mention the context of the renewed interest in and funding of community research within the UK in recent years. The Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Connected Communities Programme championed and funded research across the arts, humanities and social sciences, focusing on communities. At one point in the programme, they also championed research co-produced with communities, which they called ‘co design and co-creation’, a very bold step for an academically oriented research council. Several of the authors in this special issue had research funded in this way or in ways related to it. In creating this programme, the AHRC made new kinds of research innovation in relation to community, possible.
重新思考社区研究
DOI：
--
发表时间：
--
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Studdert D
通讯作者：
Studdert D