Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults? A meta-analytic investigation
Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults? A meta-analytic investigation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-006x.73.6.1056
复制
发表时间：
2005-12-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Douglas, KS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Guy, LS;Edens, JF;Douglas, KS
叙述性评论提出了几个问题，关于预测有效性的野兔精神病检查表修订版（PCL-R; R。D. Hare，2003）和相关量表在机构设置。在这项荟萃分析中，作者对273个效应量进行了编码，以调查Hare量表与越来越具体的机构不当行为之间的关联。总体、因子1和因子2评分的效应量总体上相当异质，并且对于身体暴力不当行为而言是最弱的（r（w）分别=.17、.14和.15）。主持人分析表明，美国监狱样本中的身体暴力效应量（r（w）= .11）小于非美国监狱样本（r（w）= .23）。研究结果进行了讨论的效用的野兔措施，在机构和其他背景下的决策。
Narrative reviews have raised several questions regarding the predictive validity of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 2003) and related scales in institutional settings. In this meta-analysis, the authors coded 273 effect sizes to investigate the association between the Hare scales and a hierarchy of increasingly specific forms of institutional misconduct. Effect sizes for Total, Factor 1, and Factor 2 scores were quite heterogeneous overall and weakest for physically violent misconduct (r(w) =.17, .14, and .15, respectively). Moderator analyses suggested that physical violence effect sizes were smaller in U.S. prison samples (r(w) = .11) than in non-U.S. prison samples (r(w) = .23). Findings are discussed in terms of the utility of the Hare measures for decision-making in institutional and other contexts.