Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision : results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D.
Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision : results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D.
复制标题
DOI：
10.2165/00148365-200403020-00006
复制
发表时间：
2004-01-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Summerfield, Quentin A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barton, Garry R;Bankart, John;Summerfield, Quentin A
评估了609名听力受损成年人的效用评分，这些成年人在佩戴助听器之前和之后均完成了EQ-5D、健康效用指数III（HUI 3）和SF-6D调查工具。干预前，EQ-5D（0.80）和SF-6D（0.78）的平均效用评分显著高于平均HUI 3效用评分（0.58）。干预后，HUI 3的平均改善（0.06变化）显著高于EQ-5D（0.01变化）或SF-6D（0.01变化）的平均改善。因此，助听器提供的估计成本效益可能取决于使用哪种工具来衡量效用。
Utility scores were estimated for 609 hearing-impaired adults who completed EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3) and SF-6D survey instruments both before and after being provided with a hearing aid. Pre-intervention, the mean utility scores for EQ-5D (0.80) and SF-6D (0.78) were significantly higher than the mean HUI3 utility score (0.58). Post-intervention, the mean improvement in the HUI3 (0.06 change) was significantly higher than the mean improvement according to the EQ-5D (0.01 change) or SF-6D (0.01 change). The estimated cost effectiveness of hearing-aid provision is therefore likely to be dependent on which instrument is used to measure utility.