Organized interests and the state: A disintegrating relationship? Evidence from Denmark
Organized interests and the state: A disintegrating relationship? Evidence from Denmark
复制标题
有组织的利益和国家：一种正在瓦解的关系？
DOI：
10.1111/1475-6765.00570
复制
发表时间：
2001
影响因子：
5.3
通讯作者：
J. Blom‐Hansen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Blom‐Hansen
事实证明，很难确定社团主义的发展方向。这一讨论有两个缺点：偏向宏观层面，对政策过程的各个阶段缺乏明确区分。为了弥补这些不足，本文以1980年以来的20年为线索，对法团主义的发展历程进行了梳理，并以此为基础，对法团主义发展的原因进行了阐释。分析包括对丹麦七个政策领域的比较研究。通过集中在一个国家内的中观层面，我们获得了方法上的优势，能够保持恒定的一些变量在宏观层面上，这是难以控制的跨国分析。因此，我们能够阐明一些对社团主义的普遍先进解释的解释价值：党派影响;国家传统;和政策特定因素。这些解释都不充分。本文最后提出了一种与丹麦数据更一致的解释，即从政治家和机构的角度研究社团主义。
It has proven difficult to determine the direction in which corporatism is moving. This discussion is marred by two shortcomings: A bias towards the macro-level and the lack of a clear distinction between the stages of the policy process. Trying to remedy these shortcomings, this paper follows the development of corporatism over the twenty years since 1980 and uses this material to illuminate the causes of the development of corporatism. The analysis consists of a comparative study of seven Danish policy areas. By focusing on the meso-level within one country we gain the methodological advantage of being able to hold constant a number of variables at the macro-level which are difficult to control for in cross-national analyses. We are thus in a position to illuminate the explanatory value of a number of commonly advanced explanations of corporatism: partisan influences; state traditions; and policy specific factors. These explanations are all found wanting. The paper concludes by suggesting an alternative explanation more consistent with the Danish data, namely that corporatism be studied from a perspective placing politicians and agency at center stage.