Long‐term gallbladder stone recurrence and risk factors after successful lithotripsy
Long‐term gallbladder stone recurrence and risk factors after successful lithotripsy
复制标题
碎石成功后长期胆囊结石复发及危险因素
DOI:
10.1097/00042737-200012020-00013
复制
发表时间:
2000
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
M. Moura
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Luís Carrilho;A. Pinto;J. Velosa;M. Moura
Objective The risk of recurrence has limited the acceptability of conservative therapies of gallbladder stones. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of stone recurrence and its risk factors, after successful shock‐wave lithotripsy. Design Prospective ultrasound follow‐up at yearly intervals or whenever biliary pain was reported. Methods One hundred and fifty‐eight consecutive patients (single stone, n = 130; two or three stones, n = 28) were followed up to 70 months (median, 33 months) after stone disappearance and discontinuation of ursodeoxycholic acid. Results Forty‐three patients developed recurrent stones. By actuarial analysis, the recurrence rates (as a percent) at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years were, respectively: 6 ± 2, 14 ± 3, 27 ± 4, 35 ± 5, and 44 ± 6 (observed ± SE). Cox's regression analysis identified high body mass indexes to be a risk factor (P = 0.02) for newly formed stones. Having had a single primary stone did not seem to be protective. Fourteen of the 43 patients (33%) had early symptoms of recurrence. Thirty‐eight patients (89%) chose to undergo oral dissolution again, which was complemented by lithotripsy in eight patients (19%). Conclusion The 5‐year gallbladder stone recurrence after lithotripsy and ursodeoxycholic acid is not substantially smaller than that reported by post‐bile acid studies. Obesity is a risk factor for recurrent stones as it is for primary stones. Most patients with secondary stones choose to have conservative therapy again. Gallbladder stone recurrence still is one of the major drawbacks of these treatments and cost‐effective strategies are needed to prevent it. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:209‐215 © 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2000, 12:209‐215