Field education in international social work: Where we are and where we should go
Field education in international social work: Where we are and where we should go
复制标题
国际社会工作的实地教育：我们在哪里以及我们应该去哪里
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Roni Berger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O. Nuttman;Roni Berger
对目前有关国际实地教育的知识进行了批判性的审查，得出了四个主要结论。首先，关于国际社会工作(ISW)的含义存在着一场悬而未决的辩论。其次，学生、教职员工和专业人士参与ISW的动机多种多样。第三，为ISW制定课程是一个独特的挑战。第四，存在四种相互竞争的国际实地安置模式：(1)独立/一次性；(2)邻国-国家；(3)现场小组；(4)交换/互惠。在回顾的基础上，提出了有效的综合学校实地安置的原则，特别是密集的准备和派遣学校与主办学校之间的合作，以及未来研究的方向。
A critical review of current knowledge about international field education yielded four main conclusions. First, an unresolved debate exists relating to the meaning of international social work (ISW). Second, various motives drive students, faculty and professionals to participate in ISW. Third, developing a curriculum for ISW presents unique challenges. Fourth, four competing models of international field placement exist: (1) Independent/one-time; (2) Neighbor-country; (3) Onsite group; and (4) Exchange/reciprocal. Based on the review, principles for effective ISW field placement, especially intensive preparation and collaboration between sending and host schools, as well as directions for future research are offered.