Pre-hospital continuous positive airway pressure after blast lung injury and hypovolaemic shock: a modelling study.
Pre-hospital continuous positive airway pressure after blast lung injury and hypovolaemic shock: a modelling study.
复制标题
爆炸性肺损伤和低血容量休克后院前持续气道正压通气:一项模型研究。
DOI:
10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.012
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
9.8
通讯作者:
Mistry S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mistry S
BackgroundIn non-traumatic respiratory failure, pre-hospital application of CPAP reduces the need for intubation. Primary blast lung injury (PBLI) accompanied by haemorrhagic shock is common after mass casualty incidents. We hypothesised that pre-hospital CPAP is also beneficial after PBLI accompanied by haemorrhagic shock.MethodsWe performed a computer-based simulation of the cardiopulmonary response to PBLI followed by haemorrhage, calibrated from published controlled porcine experiments exploring blast injury and haemorrhagic shock. The effect of different CPAP levels was simulated in threein silicopatients who had sustained mild, moderate, or severe PBLI (10%, 25%, 50% contusion of the total lung) plus haemorrhagic shock. The primary outcome was arterial partial pressure of oxygen (Pao2) at the end of each simulation.ResultsIn mild blast lung injury, 5 cm H2O ambient-air CPAP increasedPao2from 10.6 to 12.6 kPa. Higher CPAP did not further improvePao2. In moderate blast lung injury, 10 cm H2O CPAP produced a larger increase inPao2(from 8.5 to 11.1 kPa), but 15 cm H2O CPAP produced no further benefit. In severe blast lung injury, 5 cm H2O CPAP inceasedPao2from 4.06 to 8.39 kPa. Further increasing CPAP to 10–15 cm H2O reducedPao2(7.99 and 7.90 kPa, respectively) as a result of haemodynamic impairment resulting from increased intrathoracic pressures.ConclusionsOur modelling study suggests that ambient air 5 cm H2O CPAP may benefit casualties suffering from blast lung injury, even with severe haemorrhagic shock. However, higher CPAP levels beyond 10 cm H2O after severe lung injury reduced oxygen delivery as a result of haemodynamic impairment.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Kirkman, E.;Watts, S.
通讯作者:
Watts, S.
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
J. Finn;D. Brink;N. Mckenzie;Antón García;H. Tohira;G. Perkins;G. Arendts;D. Fatovich;D. Hendrie;B. McQuillan;Q. Summers;A. Celenza;Ashes Mukherjee;Ben Smedley;G. Pereira;S. Ball;T. Williams;P. Bailey
通讯作者:
P. Bailey
DOI:
10.1186/s13049-016-0315-3
发表时间:
2016-10-10
期刊:
Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Nielsen VM;Madsen J;Aasen A;Toft-Petersen AP;Lübcke K;Rasmussen BS;Christensen EF
通讯作者:
Christensen EF
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Laviola M
通讯作者:
Laviola M