Restorative Justice: A Conceptual Framework
Restorative Justice: A Conceptual Framework
复制标题
恢复性司法：概念框架
DOI：
10.1080/10282580.2013.769309
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Howse
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jennifer J. Llewellyn;R. Howse
恢复性司法已成为加拿大和外国法律和社会政策讨论中的一个时髦术语。恢复性司法当然不是一个新想法。事实上，它是我们关于法律和冲突解决的理念的基础。然而，该术语的含义尚不明确。它经常被用作一个包罗万象的短语来指代任何看起来不像司法行政主流做法的做法，特别是在刑事司法领域。很少有人试图阐明恢复性实践的区别。相反，我们只是满足于确定恢复性司法不是什么——即法庭上的两名律师、陪审团和/或法官。
Restorative justice has become a fashionable term both in Canadian and foreign legal and social policy discourse. Restorative justice is certainly not a new idea. In fact, it is foundational to our very ideas about law and conflict resolution. There is, nevertheless, a lack of clarity about the meaning of this term. Often it is used as a catchall phrase to refer to any practice which does not look like the mainstream practice of the administration of justice, particularly in the area of criminal justice. Little attention has been spent attempting to articulate what distinguishes a practice as restorative. Rather, we have been content simply to identify what restorative justice is not - namely two lawyers, a jury and/or judge in a courtroom.