Plagiarism in Programming Assessments
Plagiarism in Programming Assessments
复制标题
编程评估中的抄袭
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Ibrahim Albluwi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ibrahim Albluwi
这篇文章是一个系统的审查工作，在计算机教育文献的剽窃。综述的目的是总结文献中发现的主要结果，并强调需要进一步工作的领域。尽管有大量关于剽窃的研究，但到目前为止还没有系统的综述发表。本文使用欺诈威慑领域的一个名为欺诈三角的理论框架对所综述的论文进行了分类和分析。根据这一框架，当一个人处于压力之下，意识到有机会进行欺诈，并以一种对他或她来说似乎不道德的方式将欺诈行为合理化时，欺诈行为就会发生。审查发现，最大数量的审查论文讨论了减少剽窃机会的方法，以及检测剽窃的工具。然而，显然缺乏对这些战略和工具的威慑效力进行评估的实证工作。被审查的论文还提到了计算机专业的学生在为剽窃辩护时使用的各种合理化，其中最重要的是源于对什么构成剽窃的混淆的合理化。最后，在计算课程和剽窃的压力之间的关系的工作被认为是非常稀缺的，不相称的重大贡献，这一因素的剽窃。
This article is a systematic review of work in the computing education literature on plagiarism. The goal of the review is to summarize the main results found in the literature and highlight areas that need further work. Despite the the large body of work on plagiarism, no systematic reviews have been published so far. The reviewed papers were categorized and analyzed using a theoretical framework from the field of Fraud Deterrence named the Fraud Triangle. According to this framework, fraudulent behavior occurs when the person is under pressure, perceives the availability of an opportunity to commit fraud, and rationalizes the fraudulent behavior in a way that makes it seem not unethical to him or her. The review found the largest amount of the reviewed papers to discuss ways for reducing the opportunity to plagiarize, as well as tools for detecting plagiarism. However, there is a clear lack of empirical work evaluating the deterrent efficacy of these strategies and tools. The reviewed papers also included mentions of a wide range of rationalizations used by computing students when justifying plagiarism, the most important of which are rationalizations that stem from confusion about what constitutes plagiarism. Finally, work on the relationship between pressure in computing courses and plagiarism was found to be very scarce and incommensurate with the significant contribution of this factor to plagiarism.