Problems of the Institutional-Legal and Organizational Provision of Systemic Innovation Policy: the Case of Ukraine

Problems of the Institutional-Legal and Organizational Provision of Systemic Innovation Policy: the Case of Ukraine
复制标题

系统性创新政策的制度法律和组织规定问题:乌克兰的案例

DOI:
10.2478/cer-2019-0004
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Kalachevska
L. Kalachevska
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
I. Koblianska;L. Kalachevska

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 本文基于 IS 方法,研究了乌克兰创新政策现有制度、法律和组织特性的“系统”维度,IS 方法被视为创新政策形成的主要指导方针之一,特别是,也是乌克兰框架的基础。作者发现,国家战略文件没有充分反映国家创新体系的系统特征,也没有将联系或企业置于国家创新体系的核心。由于当前中央执行机构在该领域的活动组织和权力,确定了创新政策无法完全实现的领域,特别是:对商业的影响、基础设施的形成和联系的发展。探讨了欧洲国家在创新政策实施领域的经验,特别是国家创新机构模式的创建和运作及其职能范围。借鉴欧洲经验,建议乌克兰设立国家创新与发展局,整合区域项目资助、提供咨询等职能,实现创新中介机构的基本职能。
Abstract The article investigates the “systemic” dimension of the existing institutional-legal and organizational peculiarities of the innovation policy in Ukraine, based on the IS approach, which is seen as one of the main guidelines for the innovation policy formation, and, in particular, underlies the Ukrainian framework as well. The authors found that state strategic documents do not sufficiently reflect the systemic character of the NIS, nor do they place linkages or firms at the core of the national innovation system. Areas are determined where the innovation policy cannot be realized completely because of the current organization of activities and powers of the central executive authorities in this field, specifically: the impact on business, the formation of infrastructure, and the development of linkages. European countries’ experience in the field of innovation policy implementation is explored, particularly, the creation and operating of the models of the national innovation agencies as well as the spectrum of their functions. Based on the European experience, it is proposed that a State Agency for Innovation and Development in Ukraine be created that will integrate the functions of regional project funding, provide advice, and realize the basic functions of the innovation intermediary.