Identifying factors influencing orthodontic residency program selection.
Identifying factors influencing orthodontic residency program selection.
复制标题
确定影响正畸住院医师计划选择的因素。
DOI：
10.1002/jdd.13431
复制
发表时间：
2024
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Jacox,LauraAnne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nanney,EleanorM;Shumaker,Abbigale;Gutierrez,Triny;Mitchell,Kelly;Bowers,SylviaAFrazier;Wiesen,Chris;Mihas,Paul;Jacox,LauraAnne
目的与过去30年相比，正畸住院医师的需求仍然很高。本次调查旨在重新评估因素影响正畸住院医师计划选择当代的挑战和变化，包括增加学生债务，减少住院津贴，并改变实践models.MethodsThis混合方法研究包括访谈（定性）和调查（定量）。15名最后一年的牙科学生和第一年的正畸居民接受了一对一的采访，然后使用MAXQDA 2022进行分析，以确定价值观，因素和与程序选择和排名相关的影响。定性调查结果和以前的研究为2020 - 2022年分发给居住申请人的调查提供了基础。数据进行了分析与债务group.ResultsInterviews分层的双变量和描述性统计（N= 15）提升的重要性，位置，面试经验，程序成本，和临床教育。调查（N= 239）确定了项目选择的最理想因素：满意的住院医师，多种技术的强大临床培训，良好的面试印象，低成本，高患者数量，良好的声誉，以及新技术的良好临床设施。不太理想的因素包括计划，是基于医院的，证书-只，研究密集型，并需要大量的下班后works.ConclusionsClinical教育和面试经验是居住选择的关键，与以前的研究一致，虽然程序成本增长的重要性。研究结果可以帮助指导正畸项目招募申请人，并建议需要限制教育费用。
PurposeThe desirability of Orthodontic Residency remains high today relative to the past 30 years. This investigation seeks to re‐assess factors influencing Orthodontic Residency program selection amidst contemporary challenges and changes, including increasing student debt, reduced residency stipends, and shifting practice models.MethodsThis mixed‐methods study consisted of interviews (qualitative) and surveys (quantitative). Fifteen final‐year dental students and first‐year orthodontic residents were interviewed one‐on‐one following a topic guide and then transcripts were analyzed using MAXQDA2022 to identify values, factors, and influences related to program selection and ranking. Qualitative findings and previous studies provided the basis for a survey distributed to residency applicants in 2020‐22. Data were analyzed with bivariate and descriptive statistics with stratification by debt group.ResultsInterviews (N= 15) elevated the importance of location, interview experience, program cost, and clinical education. Surveys (N= 239) identified the most desirable factors for program selection: satisfied residents, strong clinical training with multiple techniques, good interview impressions, low cost, high patient numbers, a strong reputation, and good clinical facilities with new technology. Less desirable factors include programs that are hospital‐based, certificate‐only, research‐intensive, and require considerable after‐hours work.ConclusionsClinical education and interview experiences are key for residency selection, consistent with prior studies, though program cost has grown in importance. Findings can help guide orthodontic programs in recruiting applicants and suggest a need to limit educational costs.