Comparative evaluation of two methods for LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues.
Comparative evaluation of two methods for LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104117
复制
发表时间:
2021-03-20
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Dwork AJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Davalieva K;Kiprijanovska S;Dimovski A;Rosoklija G;Dwork AJ
The proteomics of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples has advanced significantly during the last two decades, but there are many protocols and few studies comparing them directly. There is no consensus on the most effective protocol for shotgun proteomic analysis. We compared the in-solution digestion with RapiGest and Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) of FFPE prostate tissues stored 7 years and mirroring fresh frozen samples, using two label-free data-independent LC-MS/MS acquisitions. RapiGest identified more proteins than FASP, with almost identical numbers of proteins from fresh and FFPE tissues and 69% overlap, good preservation of high-MW proteins, no bias regarding isoelectric point, and greater technical reproducibility. On the other hand, FASP yielded 20% fewer protein identifications in FFPE than in fresh tissue, with 64–69% overlap, depletion of proteins >70kDa, lower efficiency in acidic and neutral range, and lower technical reproducibility. Both protocols showed highly similar subcellular compartments distribution, highly similar percentages of extracted unique peptides from FFPE and fresh tissues and high positive correlation between the absolute quantitation values of fresh and FFPE proteins. In conclusion, RapiGest extraction of FFPE tissues delivers a proteome that closely resembles the fresh frozen proteome and should be preferred over FASP in biomarker and quantification studies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7
作者:
Hood, BL;Darfler, MM;Krizman, DB
通讯作者:
Krizman, DB
影响因子:
3
作者:
Davalieva, Katarina;Kiprijanovska, Sanja;Polenakovic, Momir
通讯作者:
Polenakovic, Momir
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Kennedy, Jacob J.;Whiteaker, Jeffrey R.;Paulovich, Amanda G.
通讯作者:
Paulovich, Amanda G.
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Ikeda, K;Monden, T;Monden, M
通讯作者:
Monden, M
影响因子:
7.3
作者:
Nirmalan, Niroshini J.;Harnden, Patricia;Banks, Rosamonde E.
通讯作者:
Banks, Rosamonde E.