Tobacco purchasing in Australia during regular tax increases: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project.
Tobacco purchasing in Australia during regular tax increases: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project.
复制标题
定期增税期间澳大利亚的烟草采购：国际烟草控制政策评估项目的调查结果。
DOI：
10.1136/tc-2023-058130
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Gartner,CoralE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cho,Ara;Scollo,Michelle;Chan,Gary;Driezen,Pete;Hyland,Andrew;Shang,Ce;Gartner,CoralE
我们研究了澳大利亚烟草购买趋势，每种购买类型中支付的平均自我报告价格以及购买的烟草产品类型与参与者特征（包括戒烟意图）之间的关联，在2007年至2020年期间，我们分析了从吸烟工厂制造和/或自己卷烟（RYO）的成年人中收集的9波数据（2007 - 2020）的国际烟草控制政策评估项目澳大利亚调查（nsample = 5452，nobservations = 11534）。主要的结果措施是购买的烟草产品的类型：RYO，纸箱，包装或小袋的大小和品牌。Logistic回归，拟合使用广义估计方程，估计结果和参与者的特征之间的关联。结果报告的价格最小化购买模式从2007年到2020年增加：任何RYO（23.8 - 43.9%），大包装（2007年：24.0%至2016年：34.3%）;从大型包装转向小型包装（2020年：37. 7%）及经济型品牌（2007年：37. 2%至2020年：59. 3%）;由大型（2007年：55. 8%）转向小型经济型包装（2014年：15. 3%至2020年：48. 1%）。个人收入较低，尼古丁依赖水平较高，没有戒烟意向更有可能购买RYO和大尺寸packs.ConclusionRYO，大尺寸的包装和产品具有较低的前期成本（例如，小RYO邮袋和小尺寸的经济品牌包）可能会吸引低收入的人。澳大利亚不同的烟草包装和小袋尺寸使烟草业能够影响烟草购买。标准化的包装和邮袋的大小可能会减少一些价格相关的营销，特别是有利于人们谁有一个低收入，高度上瘾，并没有戒烟的意图。
ObjectiveWe examined Australian tobacco purchasing trends, the average self-reported price paid within each purchase type and the association between type of tobacco product purchased and participant characteristics, including quit intentions, between 2007 and 2020.MethodsWe analysed data collected from adults who smoked factory-made and/or roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes in nine waves (2007–2020) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Australia Survey (nsample=5452, nobservations=11 534). The main outcome measures were type of tobacco products purchased: RYO, carton, pack or pouch size and brand segment. Logistic regression, fit using generalised estimating equations, was estimated the association between the outcome and participant characteristics.ResultsThe reported price-minimising purchasing patterns increased from 2007 to 2020: any RYO (23.8–43.9%), large-sized pack (2007: 24.0% to 2016: 34.3%); shifting from large-sized to small-sized packs (2020: 37.7%), and economy brand (2007: 37.2% to 2020: 59.3%); shifting from large (2007: 55.8%) to small economy packs (2014: 15.3% to 2020: 48.1%). Individuals with a lower income, a higher nicotine dependence level and no quit intention were more likely to purchase RYO and large-sized packs.ConclusionRYO, large-sized packs and products with a low upfront cost (eg, small RYO pouches and small-sized economy brand packs) may appeal to people on low incomes. Australia’s diverse tobacco pack and pouch sizes allow the tobacco industry to influence tobacco purchases. Standardising pack and pouch sizes may reduce some price-related marketing and especially benefit people who have a low income, are highly addicted and have no quit intention.