Operationalizing resilience: co-creating a framework to monitor hard, natural, and nature-based shoreline features in New York State.
Operationalizing resilience: co-creating a framework to monitor hard, natural, and nature-based shoreline features in New York State.
复制标题
实施复原力：共同创建一个框架来监测纽约州硬质、自然和基于自然的海岸线特征。
DOI：
10.5751/es-12182-260310
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
D. Corbett
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Wijsman;D. S. N. Auyeung;Pippa Brashear;B. Branco;Kathryn Graziano;P. Groffman;Helen Cheng;D. Corbett
人们对应用基于自然的解决方案来适应气候变化和提高复原力越来越感兴趣，但其实施存在障碍。其中包括与传统解决方案相比，其功能缺乏证据，以及现有设计、政策和评估流程无法获得这些解决方案的多重好处。将此视为实施和衡量复原力的挑战，我们认为复原力的概念需要在应用管理环境中被赋予具体含义。从海岸线脆弱性作为一个政策问题和自然和基于自然的海岸线特征作为一个有希望的解决方案开始，我们提出了一个共同创造过程的案例研究，以产生一种跨学科和与当地相关的方法来理解和捕捉自然和基于自然的解决方案的好处。我们开发了复原力服务的概念，以实现复原力的具体化，同时考虑到生态、技术和社会维度。通过共同创作过程，我们的研究人员-从业者网络开发了纽约州海岸线特征的监测框架，以促进自然和基于自然的特征与传统海岸线方法的比较。我们描述了整合科学投入和当地知识的过程并评估了其优点和缺点。我们提出了监测框架，展示了该过程的共同创造特征如何通过参数、指标和协议的选择对最终框架的制定产生影响。我们认为，跨学科性、共同创造、实用主义、多尺度适用性和政策相关性是理解基于自然的解决方案的运作和促进实施的关键原则，同时认识到这项工作需要妥协，因此将导致持续的审议。我们认为这是该过程的优势，因为它承认弹性的创造是一个以价值观为核心且可能发生变化的社会过程。
There is growing interest in the application of nature-based solutions to adapt to climate change and promote resilience, yet barriers exist to their implementation. These include a perceived lack of evidence of their functioning in comparison to conventional solutions and an inability for existing design, policy, and assessment processes to capture the multiple benefits of these solutions. Positing this as a challenge of operationalizing and measuring resilience, we argue that the concept of resilience needs to be given concrete meaning in applied management contexts. Starting with shoreline vulnerability as a policy problem and natural and naturebased shoreline features as a promising solution, we present a case study of a co-creative process to produce an interdisciplinary and locally relevant approach to understanding and capturing the benefits of natural and nature-based solutions. We develop the notion of resilience service to enable a concreteness to resilience that simultaneously takes into account ecological, technical, and social dimensions. Through the co-creative process, our researcher-practitioner network developed a monitoring framework for shoreline features in New York State to facilitate the comparison of natural and nature-based features with conventional shoreline approaches. We describe the process and assess the advantages and drawbacks of integrating scientific input and local knowledge. We present the monitoring framework, showing how the co-creative character of the process is consequential in the formulation of the final framework through the selection of parameters, indicators, and protocols. We argue that interdisciplinarity, co-creation, pragmatism, multi-scalar applicability, and policy relevance are critical principles to understand the functioning and facilitate the implementation of naturebased solutions, while recognizing that this work necessitates compromise and as such will lead to continued deliberation. We posit this is a strength of the process for it acknowledges the creation of resilience as a social process in which values are central and subject to change.
沿海灾害的海滨视角：地理暴露、海岸线类型和沿海居民灾害关注之间的关系
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Scyphers, Steven B.
通讯作者：
Scyphers, Steven B.