Adolescents' Social Reasoning About Relational Aggression
Adolescents' Social Reasoning About Relational Aggression
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10826-009-9319-1
复制
发表时间：
2010-08-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Tisak, Marie S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Goldstein, Sara E.;Tisak, Marie S.
我们考察了早期青少年对关系攻击的推理，以及他们的推理与他们自己的关系攻击行为之间的联系。思考关系攻击性被比作思考身体攻击、常规侵犯和个人行为。在个人访谈中，青少年(N=103)对关系攻击、身体攻击、常规违规和个人行为的可接受性进行了评级，并证明了他们的评级是合理的。结果表明，青少年对关系攻击的看法是复杂的。尽管八卦被认为是非常错误的(类似于关于身体攻击的看法)，但排斥被认为在某种程度上是可以接受的(比传统的侵犯行为错误得少，但比个人行为更错误)。关于攻击性信念与攻击行为之间的关系，结果表明，关于八卦的信念与八卦行为有关，而关于身体攻击的信念与身体攻击行为有关。关于排斥的信念和排斥行为之间没有联系。在攻击行为的社会领域理论和社会信息加工模型的框架内，讨论了对未来研究的启示和建议。
We examined early adolescents' reasoning about relational aggression, and the links that their reasoning has to their own relationally aggressive behavior. Thinking about relational aggression was compared to thinking about physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior. In individual interviews, adolescents (N = 103) rated the acceptability of relational aggression, physical aggression, conventional violations, and personal behavior, and justified their ratings. Results indicated that adolescents' views about relational aggression are complex. Although gossip was viewed as very wrong (comparable to beliefs about physical aggression), exclusion was perceived to be somewhat acceptable (less wrong than conventional violations, but more wrong than personal behaviors). With regard to associations between beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior, the results indicated that beliefs about gossip were associated with gossiping behavior, and that beliefs about physical aggression were associated with physically aggressive behavior. No links emerged between beliefs about exclusion and exclusionary behavior. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed within the frameworks of social domain theory and social information processing models of aggressive behavior.