Bias in the priming of object decisions: logic, assumption, and data.
Bias in the priming of object decisions: logic, assumption, and data.
复制标题
对象决策启动的偏差：逻辑、假设和数据。
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.768
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Cooper,LA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schacter,DL;Cooper,LA
R.拉特克利夫和G. McKoon（参见记录1995-42754-001）描述了7个实验，这些实验使他们得出结论，在由DL Schacter、LA库珀和SM Delaney（1990）介绍的物体决策任务中，可能但并非不可能的物体的启动归因于外显记忆过程，该过程抵消了将所研究的物体称为”可能的“的偏见。“基于这一点，拉特克利夫和麦孔声称已经破坏了我们的假设，即结构描述系统在客体决策启动中起着重要作用。拉特克利夫和麦孔还对启动和外显记忆的多记忆系统解释提出了一般性的批评。拉特克利夫和麦孔的论点是基于一个不准确的特点沙克特等人。的理论地位;拉特克利夫和麦孔关于外显记忆抵消偏差的观点的证据很弱，而且作为拉特克利夫和麦孔具体实验操作基础的核心假设以及他们的一般结论也值得怀疑。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
R. Ratcliff and G. McKoon (see record 1995-42754-001) describe 7 experiments that led them to conclude that priming of possible but not impossible objects on the object decision task introduced by DL Schacter, LA Cooper, & SM Delaney (1990) is attributable to explicit memory processes that offset a bias to call studied objects" possible." On the basis of this point, Ratcliff and McKoon claim to have undermined our hypothesis that a structural description system plays an important role in object decision priming. Ratcliff and McKoon also offer a general critique of multiple memory systems accounts of priming and explicit memory. Ratcliff and McKoon's arguments are based on an inaccurate characterization of Schacter et al.'s theoretical position; the evidence for Ratcliff and McKoon's idea that explicit memory offsets bias is weak, and the central assumptions that underlie both Ratcliff and McKoon's specific experimental manipulations and their general conclusions are questionable.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)