Leveraging shadow networks for procedural justice
Leveraging shadow networks for procedural justice
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101190
复制
发表时间：
2022-08-01
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Yazar，Mahir
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
York，Abigail;Yazar，Mahir
强调影子网络中的不同社区的包容性促进了程序正义。影子网络中的社会学习可能使新的治理结构得以出现。紧急治理可能不一定促进社会生态正义。社会生态正义可能通过更具包容性的影子网络部分实现。行动主义与影子网络的参与可能进一步促进社会生态正义。越来越多的环境可持续性治理研究调查程序正义，它的重点是公平，歧视和决策的包容性。为了理解不公平和环境不公正的（再）生产，我们必须研究谁被包括在内和排除在外，什么类型的知识和信息被纳入，以及更具包容性的过程如何可能（不）促进环境治理的转型。越来越多的实证文献探讨了影子网络扩大治理领域包容性的潜力。影子网络在主导系统内外工作，促进信息流动，创建专家节点，确定知识差距，参与社会学习，探索现状的替代方案，但一些影子网络强化了历史遗留的不公正现象，加剧了排斥，并集中了特定的行为者或社区。
HighlightsInclusion of diverse communities in shadow networks advances procedural justice.Social learning within shadow networks may enable new governance structures to emerge.Emergent governance may not necessarily advancesocioecological justice.Socioecological justice may be partially realized via more inclusive shadow networks.Activism coupled with shadow-network engagement may further socioecological justice.Increasingly, environmental sustainability-governance research investigates procedural justice, which is focused on fairness, discrimination, and inclusion in decision-making. To understand the (re) production of inequity and environmental injustice, we must examine who is included and excluded, what types of knowledge and information are incorporated, and how more inclusive processes may (not) facilitate transformation of environmental governance. A growing empirical literature explores the potential of shadow networks to expand inclusion in governance arenas. Shadow networks work inside and outside the dominant system, facilitate information flows, create nodes of expertize, identify knowledge gaps, engage in social learning, and explore alternatives to the status quo, yet some shadow networks reinforce historic legacies of injustice exacerbating exclusion and centering particular actors or communities.