Arrhythmic and Mortality Outcomes Among Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients Receiving Primary ICD Therapy.
Arrhythmic and Mortality Outcomes Among Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients Receiving Primary ICD Therapy.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacep.2021.06.020
复制
发表时间:
2022-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Goldenberg I
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Narins CR;Aktas MK;Chen AY;McNitt S;Ling FS;Younis A;Zareba W;Daubert JP;Huang DT;Rosero S;Kutyifa V;Goldenberg I
There are conflicting data on the benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with ischemic versus non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM/NICM). We sought to determine the association of cardiomyopathy etiology with the likelihood of ventricular arrhythmias, appropriate ICD therapy and mortality. The study population comprised 4,803 patients with ICM (n=3,106) or NICM (n=1,697) with a primary prevention ICD enrolled in 5 randomized trials conducted between 1997 and 2017. The primary endpoint was sustained ventricular tachycardia ≥200 bpm or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). Secondary endpoints included appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause mortality. Differences in cause-specific mortality, including non-cardiac, sudden cardiac, and non-sudden cardiac, were also examined. Patients with ICM were significantly older and had more comorbid conditions, whereas those with NICM had more advanced heart failure (HF) class at enrollment and were more often prescribed medical or cardiac resynchronization therapy for HF. Multivariate analysis showed that ICM vs. NICM had a similar risk of VT/VF events (HR=0.98 [95% CI 0.79–1.20]) and appropriate ICD therapy (HR=1.03 [95% CI 0.87–1.22]), whereas the risk of all-cause mortality was 1.8-fold higher among ICM vs. NICM patients (HR=1.84 [95%CI 1.42–2.38]), dominated by non-sudden cardiac mortality. Combined data from 5 landmark ICD clinical trials show that ICM patients experience a similar risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmic events but have an increased risk of all-cause mortality, dominated by non-sudden cardiac death, compared with NICM patients. We examined whether outcomes and potential benefits of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy differ among individuals with ischemic versus non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM/NICM). Among 4,803 patients with a primary prevention ICD enrolled in five prospective clinical trials, the risks of sustained rapid ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and appropriate defibrillator therapy were similar in ICM versus NICM. Mortality, primarily related to non-sudden cardiac death, was substantially higher with ischemic cardiomyopathy. We conclude that individuals with NICM demonstrate similar arrhythmic burden but a lower incidence of death compared to those with ICM.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Moss, AJ;Hall, WJ;Heo, M
通讯作者:
Heo, M
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Moss, Arthur J.;Hall, W. Jackson;Zareba, Wojciech
通讯作者:
Zareba, Wojciech
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacep.2016.09.006
发表时间:
2017-03-01
期刊:
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Levy, Wayne C;Li, Yanhong;O'Connor, Christopher M
通讯作者:
O'Connor, Christopher M
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Buxton, AE;Lee, KL;Hafley, G
通讯作者:
Hafley, G
影响因子:
39.3
作者:
Priori, Silvia G.;Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina;Zannad, Faiez
通讯作者:
Zannad, Faiez