Modified FOLFIRINOX Versus CISGEM Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (PRODIGE 38 AMEBICA): A Randomized Phase II Study

Modified FOLFIRINOX Versus CISGEM Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (PRODIGE 38 AMEBICA): A Randomized Phase II Study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1200/jco.21.00679
复制
发表时间:
2022-01-20
影响因子:
45.3
通讯作者:
Malka, David
Malka, David
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Phelip, Jean marc;Desrame, Jerome;Malka, David

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的 对于晚期胆道癌 (BTC),三联化疗是否优于双联化疗尚不清楚。方法 在这项开放标签、随机 II-III 期研究中,局部晚期或转移性 BTC 且东部肿瘤合作组体能状态为 0 或 1 的患者被随机分配 (1:1) 接受奥沙利铂、伊立替康和输注氟尿嘧啶 (mFOLFIRINOX) 或顺铂和吉西他滨 (CISGEM) 治疗,最长 6 个月。我们报告了 II 期部分的结果,其中主要终点是根据实体瘤 1.1 版疗效评估标准接受至少一剂治疗的患者(改良意向治疗人群)的 6 个月无进展生存率 (PFS)(统计假设:6 个月 PFS 率 >= 59%,预期 73%)。结果 共有 191 名患者(改良意向治疗人群,185 名:mFOLFIRINOX,92 名;CISGEM,93 名)被随机分配到 43 个法国中心。中位随访 21 个月后,mFOLFIRINOX 组的 6 个月 PFS 率为 44.6%(90% CI,35.7 至 53.7),CISGEM 组为 47.3%(90% CI,38.4 至 56.3)。 mFOLFIRINOX 组的中位 PFS 为 6.2 个月(95% CI,5.5 至 7.8),CISGEM 组为 7.4 个月(95% CI,5.6 至 8.7)。 mFOLFIRINOX 组的中位总生存期为 11.7 个月(95% CI,9.5 至 14.2),CISGEM 组的中位总生存期为 13.8 个月(95% CI,10.9 至 16.1)。 mFOLFIRINOX 组中 72.8% 的患者和 CISGEM 组中 72.0% 的患者发生≥ 3 级的不良事件(毒性死亡:mFOLFIRINOX 组,2 例;CISGEM 组,1 例)。结论 mFOLFIRINOX 三联化疗未达到主要研究终点。 CISGEM 双药化疗仍然是晚期 BTC 的一线标准。
PURPOSE Whether triplet chemotherapy is superior to doublet chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is unknown. METHODS In this open-label, randomized phase II-III study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional fluorouracil (mFOLFIRINOX), or cisplatin and gemcitabine (CISGEM) for a maximum of 6 months. We report the results of the phase II part, where the primary end point was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate among the patients who received at least one dose of treatment (modified intention-to-treat population) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (statistical assumptions: 6-month PFS rate >= 59%, 73% expected). RESULTS A total of 191 patients (modified intention-to-treat population, 185: mFOLFIRINOX, 92; CISGEM, 93) were randomly assigned in 43 French centers. After a median follow-up of 21 months, the 6-month PFS rate was 44.6% (90% CI, 35.7 to 53.7) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 47.3% (90% CI, 38.4 to 56.3) in the CISGEM arm. Median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.7) in the CISGEM arm. Median overall survival was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 14.2) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.9 to 16.1) in the CISGEM arm. Adverse events >= grade 3 occurred in 72.8% of patients in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 72.0% of patients in the CISGEM arm (toxic deaths: mFOLFIRINOX arm, two; CISGEM arm, one). CONCLUSION mFOLFIRINOX triplet chemotherapy did not meet the primary study end point. CISGEM doublet chemotherapy remains the first-line standard in advanced BTC.