The Oxford handbook of political leadership
The Oxford handbook of political leadership
复制标题
牛津政治领导手册
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653881.001.0001
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Hart
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Rhodes;P. Hart
快速增长的研究领域·全面而广泛的卷·政治领导力领域领先国际学者的贡献卷土重来。从20世纪40年代到70年代，不仅政治学家对它进行了深入的研究，政治社会学家和心理学家、苏联学者、政治人类学家以及比较和发展研究的学者也对它进行了深入的研究。此后，随着结构主义、新制度主义和对政治、政府和治理研究的理性选择方法的兴起，该领域迷失了方向。然而，最近，学习政治的学生又回到了研究个人领导人的角色以及如何运用领导力来解释政治结果的问题上。主题清单几乎是无穷无尽的：选举、冲突管理、公共政策、政府受欢迎程度、发展、治理网络和区域一体化。在媒体时代，领导人被呈现并被舞台管理--作为几乎所有社会问题的解决方案。通过大众媒体和互联网，公民和专业观察员比以往任何时候都更密切地跟踪高级政治官员的兴衰。这本手册用这样的问题概括了这种复兴：我们今天在哪里？它通过确定各学科的独特贡献来对多学科领域进行排序。它满足了评估的迫切需要。它汇集了来自世界各地的学者，鼓励以比较的视角，提供对所有主要学科、方法和地区的全面覆盖。它展示了政治领导研究中的规范和经验传统，并将行为、制度和解释方法并列在一起。它涵盖正式的、以办公室为基础的和非正式的、新出现的政治领导，以及民主和非民主政治。读者群：政治学和社会科学领域的学者、研究人员和研究生。
Rapidly increasing area of research •Comprehensive and wide-reaching volume •Contributions from leading international scholars in the field Political leadership has made a comeback. It was studied intensively not only by political scientists but also by political sociologists and psychologists, Sovietologists, political anthropologists, and by scholars in comparative and development studies from the 1940s to the 1970s. Thereafter, the field lost its way with the rise of structuralism, neo-institutionalism, and rational choice approaches to the study of politics, government, and governance. Recently, however, students of politics have returned to studying the role of individual leaders and the exercise of leadership to explain political outcomes. The list of topics is nigh endless: elections, conflict management, public policy, government popularity, development, governance networks, and regional integration. In the media age, leaders are presented and stage-managed—spun—as the solution to almost every social problem. Through the mass media and the Internet, citizens and professional observers follow the rise, impact, and fall of senior political officeholders at closer quarters than ever before. This Handbook encapsulates the resurgence by asking, where are we today? It orders the multidisciplinary field by identifying the distinct and distinctive contributions of the disciplines. It meets the urgent need to take stock. It brings together scholars from around the world, encouraging a comparative perspective, to provide a comprehensive coverage of all the major disciplines, methods, and regions. It showcases both the normative and empirical traditions in political leadership studies, and juxtaposes behavioural, institutional, and interpretive approaches. It covers formal, office-based as well as informal, emergent political leadership, and in both democratic and undemocratic polities. Readership: Academics, researchers, and graduate students in Politics, and across the social sciences.