Research as a form of work: expertise, community and methodological objectivity
Research as a form of work: expertise, community and methodological objectivity
复制标题
研究作为一种工作形式：专业知识、社区和方法客观性
DOI：
10.1080/01411920310001629947
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
P. Hodkinson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Hodkinson
近年来，一种新的教育研究正统思想在英国和美国迅速兴起。这种正统的核心假设是，方法可以确保研究的客观性，并且需要更客观的“安全”研究来为实践提供信息。但教育研究是一个由重叠的实践社区组成的领域。这个领域有规则，但它们大多是不成文的，并且作为偶然传统的一部分而修改和变化。在这个领域内，知识的形成是通过做出具体化的判断来发展的，这种判断只能是部分理性的，并且与发展研究者的身份有关。新的正统研究需要刻意限制和修改这一领域的实践。这不大可能完全成功，但是集中的教育研究资金来源使许多研究人员变得脆弱。在抵制这些倾向的过程中，将研究视为有助于更好地理解的方式是有帮助的，这种方式更多地归功于……
Recent years have witnessed the rapid rise of a new educational research orthodoxy in the UK and the USA. Central to that orthodoxy are the assumptions that method can ensure objectivity in research, and that more objective ‘safe’ research to inform practice is needed. But educational research is a field made up of overlapping communities of practice. This field has rules, but they are largely unwritten, and modify and change as part of a contingent tradition. Within the field, knowledge formation develops through the making of embodied judgements, which can only ever be partly rational, and are related to developing researcher identities. The new research orthodoxy entails deliberate attempts to restrict and modify practices in this field. This is unlikely to completely succeed, but centralised sources of funding for educational research make many researchers vulnerable. In resisting these tendencies, it is helpful to view research as contributing to better understanding, in ways that owe more to the qua...