Measuring adult indirect aggression: The development and psychometric assessment of the indirect aggression scales
Measuring adult indirect aggression: The development and psychometric assessment of the indirect aggression scales
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ab.20074
复制
发表时间：
2005-01-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Shevlin, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Forrest, S;Eatough, V;Shevlin, M
本文介绍了一种用于成年人群体的间接攻击心理测量的发展。项目是从一系列的定性访谈中产生的。该量表有两个版本：间接攻击量表攻击版本（IAS-A）和目标版本（IAS-T）。将两种版本的量表用于不同的样本（n（A）= 294; n（T）= 294）。量表采用内部一致性项目分析和探索性因素分析进行分析。两个版本被发现有相同的一致的三个分量表：社会排斥，使用恶意幽默，和内疚感。初步的心理测量学评估表明，量表是足够可靠的（克朗巴赫的阿尔法范围从0.81至0.89）和有效的。被试在使用间接攻击或成为间接攻击的受害者方面不存在性别差异，且间接攻击行为与年龄呈显著负相关。未来的验证和潜在的使用的措施进行了讨论。(C)2005 Wiley-Liss，Inc.
This paper describes the development of a psychometric measure of indirect aggression for use in an adult population. Items were generated from a series of qualitative interviews. Two versions of the scale were developed; the Indirect Aggression Scale Aggressor version (IAS-A) and Target version (IAS-T). Both versions of the scale were administered to separate samples (n(A) = 294; n(T) = 294). Scales were analysed using item analysis of internal consistency, as well as exploratory factor analysis. Both versions were found to have the same consistent three sub-scales: social exclusion, use of malicious humour, and guilt induction. Preliminary psychometric evaluation suggests that the scales are both sufficiently reliable (with Cronbach's alphas ranging from .81 to .89) and valid. There were no gender differences in either using or being the victim of indirect aggression, and the behaviour was significantly negatively correlated with age. Future validation and potential usage of the measures are discussed. (C) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.