Better late than Now-or-Never: The case of interactive repair phenomena.
Better late than Now-or-Never: The case of interactive repair phenomena.
复制标题
迟到总比现在或永远不好：交互式修复现象的案例。
DOI：
10.1017/s0140525x15000813
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Healey PG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Healey PG
来自对话（语料库和实验）的经验证据强调了语言使用中互动的重要性，这对 Christiansen & Chater (C&C) 的提议提出了一些问题。我们赞同《C&C》对综合框架的呼吁，但认为他们对本地、个体生产和理解的强调使得很难适应对话中无处不在的、交互式的、可废止的澄清和修复过程。语言首先在交互中遇到和部署。自然交互的一个典型特征是，人们经常需要通过相互理解来解决问题，其中已经说过的内容需要以某种方式进行修改或重做。这些过程对 Christiansen & Chater (C&C) 的提案提出了一些重要问题。我们支持 C&C 的方法，并同意语言科学的综合框架是语言研究人员的理想目标。然而，我们认为《命令与征服》对本地、个体生产和理解的强调忽略了对话中澄清和修复过程所带来的一些关键挑战。
Empirical evidence from dialogue, both corpus and experimental, highlights the importance of interaction in language use–and this raises some questions for Christiansen & Chater’s (C&C’s) proposals. We endorse C&C’s call for an integrated framework but argue that their emphasis on local, individual production and comprehension makes it difficult to accommodate the ubiquitous, interactive, and defeasible processes of clarification and repair in conversation.Language is first encountered and deployed in interaction. A characteristic feature of natural interaction is that people often need to address problems with mutual understanding in which elements of what has been said need to be reworked or redone in some way. These processes raise some important questions for Christiansen & Chater’s (C&C’s) proposals. We support C&C’s approach and agree that an integrated framework for the language sciences is a desirable goal for language researchers. However, we argue that C&C’s emphasis on local, individual production and comprehension misses some of the key challenges posed by the processes of clarification and repair in conversation.