THE FEELING OF ANOTHER PERSONS KNOWING

THE FEELING OF ANOTHER PERSONS KNOWING
复制标题

DOI:
10.1006/jmla.1993.1017
复制
发表时间:
1993-06-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
NARENS, L
NARENS, L
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
JAMESON, A;NELSON, TO;NARENS, L

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们调查了关于一个人拥有的当前无法回忆的知识的预测是否(A)被该人获得不可观察信息的特权所促进,以及(B)是否受到他或她的行为方面的影响,这些方面也可以被另一个人观察到。共有106名目标受试者(A)试图回答一般性信息问题,(B)预测他们最有可能认出哪些未回答的项目,以及(C)对这些项目进行多项选择测试。观察目标回忆尝试的观察者和对目标几乎一无所知的评判者也预测了这些目标受试者的识别表现。目标者的预测比观察者更准确,而观察者又比裁判更准确。目标和观察者的预测与目标行为中的三个线索有关:(A)回忆失败的类型(遗漏错误与委托错误),(B)遗漏错误的潜伏期,和(C)委托错误的可信性。
We investigated whether predictions about the currently unrecallable knowledge that a person possesses (a) are facilitated by that person′s privileged access to nonobservable information and (b) are influenced by aspects of his or her behavior that can also be observed by another person. A total of 106targetsubjects (a) attempted to answer general-information questions (b) predicted which of the unanswered items they would be most likely to recognize, and (c) took a multiple-choice test on the items. The recognition performance of each of these target subjects was also predicted by anobserver, who had watched the target′s recall attempts, and by ajudge, who had virtually no information about the target. The targets predicted more accurately than the observers, who were in turn more accurate than the judges. The predictions of the targets and the observers were related to three cues in the targets′ behavior: (a) type of recall failure (omission error vs commission error), (b) latency of omission errors, and (c) plausibility of commission errors.