Knowledge management and informatics considerations for comparative effectiveness research: a case-driven exploration.
Knowledge management and informatics considerations for comparative effectiveness research: a case-driven exploration.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1de1
复制
发表时间:
2013-08
期刊:
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Payne PR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Embi PJ;Hebert C;Gordillo G;Kelleher K;Payne PR
As clinical data are increasingly collected and stored electronically, their potential use for comparative effectiveness research (CER) grows. Despite this promise, challenges face those wishing to leverage such data. In this paper we aim to enumerate some of the knowledge management and informatics issues common to such data re-use. After reviewing the current state of knowledge regarding biomedical informatics challenges and best practices related to CER, we then present two research projects at our institution. We analyze these and highlight several common themes and challenges related to the conduct of CER studies. Finally, we represent these emergent themes. The informatics challenges commonly encountered by those conducting CER studies include issues related to data information and knowledge management (e.g. data re-use, data preparation) as well as those related to people and organizational issues (e.g. socio-technical factors and organizational factors). Examples of these are described in further detail and a formal framework for describing these findings is presented. Significant challenges face researchers attempting to use often diverse and heterogeneous datasets for CER. These challenges must be understood in order to be dealt with successfully and can often be overcome with the appropriate use of informatics best practices. Many research and policy questions remain to be answered in order to realize the full potential of the increasingly electronic clinical data available for such research.