Between the Ottomans and the Entente

Between the Ottomans and the Entente
复制标题

奥斯曼帝国与协约国之间

DOI:
10.1093/oso/9780190872137.001.0001
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Stacy D. Fahrenthold
Stacy D. Fahrenthold
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stacy D. Fahrenthold

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

《在奥斯曼人和协约国之间》是第一部从美国、巴西和阿根廷的阿拉伯侨民的角度撰写的第一次世界大战社会史。奥斯曼帝国和协约国之间的战争使50万叙利亚、黎巴嫩和巴勒斯坦移民处于复杂的地缘政治困境。作为生活在亲协约半球的奥斯曼公民,阿拉伯移民面临着东道国社会对他们忠诚的新要求;同时,他们面临着移民限制、护照控制和国籍争端的多重法律的制度,这些制度旨在要求叙利亚移民,同时控制他们的流动。这部作品追踪了从1908年青年土耳其革命到20世纪20年代早期法国托管时期叙利亚移民的政治和激进主义。它认为,叙利亚移民活动家反对奥斯曼帝国的统治,与协约国合作,因为他们相信这场战争的工作将加强叙利亚从统一统治中解放出来的事业。相反,协约国利用叙利亚移民社区的支持,支持对后奥斯曼帝国黎凡特的殖民主张。这项工作捕捉了一系列国家项目,要求叙利亚移民在阿拉伯中东的国家建设的目的,以及叙利亚移民的努力,以抵制同质民族国家的明确模式和分割和流离失所的政策。
Between the Ottomans and the Entente is the first social history of the First World War written from the perspective of the Arab diasporas in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. The war between the Ottoman Empire and the Entente Powers placed the half million Syrian, Lebanese, and Palestinian migrants living abroad in a complicated geopolitical predicament. As Ottoman citizens living in a pro-Entente hemisphere, Arab migrants faced new demands for loyalty by their host societies; simultaneously, they confronted a multiplying legal regime of migration restriction, passport control, and nationality disputes designed to claim Syrian migrants while also controlling their movements. This work tracks the politics and activism of Syrian migrants from the 1908 Young Turk Revolution through the early French Mandate period in the 1920s. It argues that Syrian migrant activists opposed Ottoman rule from the diaspora, collaborating with the Entente powers because they believed this war work would bolster the cause of Syria’s liberation from Unionist rule. Instead, the Entente Powers used support from Syrian migrant communities to bolster colonial claims on a post-Ottoman Levant. This work captures a series of state projects to claim Syrian migrants for the purposes of nation-building in the Arab Middle East, and the efforts of Syrian migrants to resist the categorical schema of the homogenous nation-state and policies of partition and displacement.