Comparison of the micro-nutrica nutritional analysis program and the Russian food composition database using data from the Baltic nutrition surveys
Comparison of the micro-nutrica nutritional analysis program and the Russian food composition database using data from the Baltic nutrition surveys
复制标题
DOI：
10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601848
复制
发表时间：
2004-04-01
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
McKee, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vaask, S;Pomerleau, J;McKee, M
目的：本研究的目的是根据波罗的海营养调查中使用的两个食物成分数据库的数据，比较食物和饮食的营养成分（1997年在爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛进行）：芬兰Micro-Nutrica营养分析计划的改编版（在爱沙尼亚使用）和俄罗斯营养研究所食品成分数据库（在拉脱维亚和立陶宛使用）。设计：使用经过改编的Micro-Nutrica和俄罗斯数据库来估计能量和养分本报告对该地区15种常见食品的营养素（蛋白质、脂肪、碳水化合物、维生素C、钙和铁）含量以及32名拉脱维亚受访者的营养素摄入量（基于24小时召回）进行了分析。数据库之间的差异estimated.Results：有差异的能量和营养成分的15个选定的食物使用两个数据库。经过调整的Micro-Nutrica数据库通常比俄罗斯数据库提供更低的能量含量（中位数：-6%），并且通常富含脂肪的食物的脂肪含量较低。当使用Micro-Nutrica数据库时，32名选定的受访者的能量，脂肪，碳水化合物和钙的摄入量显着降低。脂肪的差异尤其高（差异=-23.5%，95%置信区间= -31.1 ~-15.8%，P < 0.0001）。结论：结果表明，波罗的海国家营养素摄入量的报告比较应谨慎对待，需要更多的研究来开发该地区可比较的国家数据库。在计划进行膳食摄入量国际调查时，应尽早调查数据库之间的潜在差异。
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the nutrient content of foods and diets based on data from two food composition databases used in the Baltic Nutrition Surveys (conducted in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 1997): an adapted version of the Finnish Micro-Nutrica Nutritional Analysis program (used in Estonia) and the Russian Institute of Nutrition Food Composition Database (used in Latvia and Lithuania).Design: The adapted Micro-Nutrica and Russian databases were used to estimate the energy and nutrient (protein, fat, carbohydrate, vitamin C, calcium and iron) content of 15 common foodstuffs in the region and the nutrient intakes of 32 Latvian respondents (based on 24-h recalls). Differences between databases were estimated.Results: There were discrepancies in the energy and nutrient content of the 15 selected foods using the two databases. The adapted Micro-Nutrica database generally gave a lower energy content than the Russian database (median: -6%), and a lower fat content for typically fat-rich foods. Intakes of energy, fat, carbohydrate and calcium by the 32 selected respondents were significantly lower when the Micro-Nutrica database was used. Differences were particularly high for fat (difference = -23.5%, 95% confidence interval = -31.1 to -15.8%, P < 0.0001).Conclusions: The results suggest that reported comparisons of nutrient intakes in the Baltic countries should be treated with caution and that more research is needed for the development of comparable national databases in the region. Potential differences between databases should be investigated early when international surveys of dietary intake are being planned.