Smoking causes creative responses: on state antismoking policy and resilient habits
Smoking causes creative responses: on state antismoking policy and resilient habits
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09581596.2010.529420
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Dennis, Simone
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dennis, Simone
这篇文章的框架是与探索道德定位和情感实践相关的复杂性-吸烟的实践。吸烟与许多问题和立场联系在一起，包括（但不限于）国家在监管机构及其实践中的角色，以及这些实践的道德定位，以及个人的权利。它还与对物体的特殊理解以及它们与其他物体的关系联系在一起。在反吸烟广告中，吸烟行为被牢牢地置于身体限制和个性的框架内，并利用特定的情感和道德立场来定位吸烟身体与其他（不吸烟）身体的关系，以及吸烟行为本身。基于细致的民族志研究，远离实践的道德和二元定位，我采用现象学的视角来探索社会的深刻体验，身体联系和破裂，以及广泛的情感体验，这些都是吸烟实践的核心。我还提请注意有关吸烟的公共政策和行动可能被理解、采取行动、抵制和改变的方式，使其在吸烟者的生活经历中具有意义。吸烟者对国家政策和行动的许多反应并不是政策制定者所希望的，这既表明了反应的创造性，也表明了对人们的行为进行过多假设的危险。
This article is framed by the complexities associated with exploring a morally positioned and emotive practice - the practice of smoking cigarettes. Smoking is bound up with a multiply of issues and positions, including (but not limited to) the role of the state in the regulation of bodies and their practices and in the moral positioning of those practices, and the rights of the individual. It is also bound up with particular understandings of bodies and their relations with other bodies. In antismoking advertisements, smoking practice is firmly situated within frames of corporeal boundedness and individuality, and particular emotions and moral positions are drawn upon to locate the smoking body relative to other (non-smoking) bodies, and to the practice of smoking itself. Based on fine-grained ethnographic research, and moving away from moral and dualistic positionings of the practice, I take up a phenomenological perspective to explore the profound experiences of sociality, corporeal connection and rupture, and the wide range of emotional experiences that are central to practices of smoking. I also draw attention to the ways in which public policy and action regarding smoking might be understood, acted upon, resisted and altered, in ways that make it meaningful in the lived experiences of smokers. Many of the responses that smokers make to state policy and action are not those intended by policy makers, and demonstrate both the creativity of the responses, and the dangers of assuming too much about how people will behave.