Accession and Social Policy: The Case of Hungary
Accession and Social Policy: The Case of Hungary
复制标题
入世与社会政策：匈牙利的案例
DOI：
10.1177/0958928704044621
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
G. Juhász
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Z. Ferge;G. Juhász
欧盟在扩大进程中加入社会因素的起步相对较晚。与欧洲社会模式相联系的愿景本可有助于处理转型后出现的社会问题，但在制定匈牙利社会政策方面没有发挥基本作用。许多因素和行为者影响了社会政策程序和制度中发生的变化。例如，国际劳工组织和欧盟影响了劳动力市场问题，而家庭政策主要受本土意识形态的影响，在某种程度上也受世界银行的影响。养老金改革完全由世界银行主导。欧盟在形成社会和民间对话方面发挥了重要作用。随着候选国进展的监测报告显示，欧盟关注的仍然是经济和政治。报告批准了受货币主义机构启发而走向新自由主义模式的举措。本文认为，近年来欧洲在社会领域的影响有所加强，其主要回报是政治对贫困和包容日益增长的兴趣和承诺，以及公民和社会对话的扩大实践。
The EU started relatively late to inject social considerations into the enlargement process. A vision connected to the European Social Model could have been instrumental in handling the social problems emerging after the transition but did not play a basic role in shaping Hungarian social policy. Many factors and actors impacted on the changes that took place in social policy procedures and institutions. For instance, the ILO and the EU influenced labour market issues, while family policy was mostly shaped by home-bred ideologies, and to some extent the World Bank. Pension reform was fully steered by the World Bank. The EU had an important role in shaping social and civil dialogue. As the monitoring reports following the progress of the candidate countries show, the concerns of the EU remained economic and political. The reports approved the moves towards the neo-liberal model inspired by the monetarist agencies. This paper argues that the European impact in the social sphere has strengthened over recent years, and its main payoff is the growing interest and commitment of politics towards poverty and inclusion, and the widening practice of civil and social dialogue.