Non-canonical agreement is canonical
Non-canonical agreement is canonical
复制标题
非规范协议是规范协议
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Polinsky
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Polinsky
本文考察了跨句一致现象，即一致的控制者（触发器）和一致的目标似乎在不同的局部域。有人认为，大多数跨条款协议的情况下，可以减少到适当的本地协议，因此是没有问题的协议理论。对这种明显的侵权行为提出了一种类型。此外，本文还考虑了一个更具挑战性的跨条款协议的情况下，控制器和目标确实是在不同的本地域（长距离协议，LDA）。研究表明，LDA涉及到嵌入小句的周边与嵌入动词之间的关系。已证实的LDA案例证明协议的句法概念与政府非常相似。
This paper examines the phenomenon of cross-clausal agreement, where the controller (trigger) of agreement and the agreement target seem to be in distinct local domains. It is argued that most instances of cross-clausal agreement can be reduced to properly local agreement and are thus unproblematic for theories of agreement. A typology of such apparent violations is proposed. In addition, the paper considers a more challenging instance of cross-clausal agreement where the controller and the target are indeed in distinct local domains (Long-Distance Agreement, LDA). It is demonstrated that LDA involves the relationship between the periphery of the embedded clause and the embedding verb. The attested cases of LDA argue for the syntactic conception of agreement that closely resembles government.