Towards an interdisciplinary perspective for the study of human expansions and biocultural diversity in the Americas
Towards an interdisciplinary perspective for the study of human expansions and biocultural diversity in the Americas
复制标题
以跨学科视角研究美洲人类扩张和生物文化多样性
DOI:
10.1002/evan.21937
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Nichols, Johanna
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Menéndez, Lumila P.;Paul, Kathleen S.;de la Fuente, Constanza;Almeida, Tatiana;Delgado, Miguel;Figueiro, Gonzalo;Jorgensen, Kelsey;Kuzminsky, Susan;López‐Sosa, María Clara;Nichols, Johanna
The timing and mode (s) of the initial human occupation of the Americas are among the most discussed topics in archaeology and biological anthropology, with hundreds of articles published in the last decades dedicated to the topic (for some comprehensive reviews, see References 1–3). Researchers have contributed to the debates through a vast range of disciplines, methodological and theoretical approaches, ranging from traditional archeological and bioarchaeological methods, to climate simulations and ancient DNA analyses. And yet, despite recent advances in the study of the biological variation and prehistoric expansions of populations into and within the Americas, there is still little consensus about key questions including the time and modes of human dispersion across the continents. This brings up a crucial question: why are we unable to find a consensus about the processes behind the initial settlements of the Americas?There are certainly multiple factors contributing to our inability to build reliable interpretations on this topic. Some of them are common to all endeavors to reconstruct and study past human societies across the planet, and some are unique to the history of research in the Americas. As a result, it is not uncommon to find significant reevaluations of current models and hypotheses, either through new findings and new methodological innovations (see, eg, the most recent findings of early footprints in New Mexico4), by the reanalysis of radiocarbon data accumulated over decades of research, 5 or due to new theoretical framings of available data (see Reference 6 as a good example). While these constant reevaluations of the origins of early inhabitants of the Americas are related to all aspects of this process (eg, chronology, cultural diversity, adaptation, and biological diversity), here we focus on recent discussions about the origins of Native American biological diversity, which by itself has been the focus of a vast and prolific literature.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
M. Hubbe;Alejandro Terrazas Mata;Brianne Herrera;Martha Benavente Sanvicente;A. González González;Carmen Rojas Sandoval;Jerónimo Avilés Olguín;Eugenio Acevez Núñez;Noreen von Cramon‐Taubadel
通讯作者:
Noreen von Cramon‐Taubadel
DOI:
10.1126/science.aaq1131
发表时间:
2018-04-27
期刊:
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bardill J;Bader AC;Garrison NA;Bolnick DA;Raff JA;Walker A;Malhi RS;Summer internship for INdigenous peoples in Genomics (SING) Consortium
通讯作者:
Summer internship for INdigenous peoples in Genomics (SING) Consortium
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
L. Menéndez;V. Bernal;P. Novellino;S. Perez
通讯作者:
S. Perez
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
M. Urban;Chiara Barbieri
通讯作者:
Chiara Barbieri
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Stoneking
通讯作者:
M. Stoneking