Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and description.

Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and description.
复制标题

话语标记和情态助词。

DOI:
10.1075/pbns.234
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Paola Pietrandrea
Paola Pietrandrea
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liesbeth Degand;B. Cornillie;Paola Pietrandrea

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

语篇标记和情态助词是难以描述的模糊语言范畴。本卷的贡献超出了本声明。他们讨论了情态助词和话语标记之间的交叉点,并检验是否可以在这两种类型的语言表达之间划清界限。基于来自言语和写作、欧洲和亚洲语言或跨语言的新的共时性和历时性数据,作者回答了语篇标记和语气助词是否是不同的类别,它们是否形成一个cline,或者语气助词是否是语篇标记的子类别的问题。这个常见问题贯穿所有章节,这使得本书成为一个连贯的整体。通过理清多功能表达分类的复杂性,本书还为意义扩展的过程提供了新的视角。传统的话语和模态功能得到了交互和文本功能的补充。功能语言学家必读之书
Discourse markers and modal particles are fuzzy linguistic categories that are difficult to describe. The contributions in this volume go beyond this statement. They discuss the intersection between modal particles and discourse markers and examine whether or not it is possible to draw a line between these two types of linguistic expressions. On the basis of new synchronic and diachronic data, from speech and writing, from European and Asian languages or cross-linguistically, the authors answer the question whether discourse markers and modal particles are distinct categories, whether they form a cline, or whether modal particles are a subcategory of discourse markers. This common question shows up throughout all chapters, which makes the book to a coherent whole. By disentangling the complexity of categorizing multifunctional expressions, this book also sheds new light on the processes of meaning extension. The traditional discourse and modal functions are complemented by interactional and textual ones. A must read for functional linguists