Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion
Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion
复制标题
将有关说服负担的论点形式化
DOI：
10.1145/1276318.1276338
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Sartor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Prakken;G. Sartor
本文提出了一种基于论证的说服责任分配推理逻辑。该逻辑扩展了Prakken（2001）的系统，该系统反过来又修改了Prakken & Sartor（1996）的系统，使其有可能在辩论游戏中将举证责任分配给双方。首先，将（2001）制度置于三种类型证明责任的区分背景下，认为该制度的证明责任实际上是说服责任。然后对（2001）系统进行修改，以允许在逻辑中对此类负担的分配进行可行的推理。通过对实际法律案件的应用，说明了该系统的实用性。
This paper presents an argument-based logic for reasoning about allocations of the burden of persuasion. The logic extends the system of Prakken (2001), which in turn modified the system of Prakken & Sartor (1996) with the possibility to distribute the burden of proof over both sides in an argument game. First the (2001) system is put in the context of a distinction of three types of proof burdens and it is argued that the proof burdens of that system are in fact burdens of persuasion. Then the (2001) system is modified to allow for defeasible reasoning about allocations of such burdens within the logic. The usefulness of the resulting system is illustrated with applications to real legal cases.